Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"labor" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Laboratory-scale simulation study on the bioremediation of marine oil pollution by phosphate-solubilizing bacteria Bacillus subtilis PSB-1 Du Z; Li Z; Chen X; Liu M; Feng L; Li Q; Chen Z; Chen Q; 41707285
ENCS
2 Design, Analysis, and Prototyping of a Multifunctional Digital Twin-Enabled Aerospace Drilling End-Effector Deployable by a Collaborative Robot Kazemiesfahani M; Dilfanian E; Monsarrat B; Hajzargarbashi S; 41471503
ENCS
3 Large scale laboratory evolution uncovers clinically relevant collateral antibiotic sensitivity Chowdhury FR; Banari V; Lesnic V; Zhanel GG; Findlay BL; 40615056
BIOLOGY
4 Leading the way to a safer workplace: What enables supervisors to be servant leaders and enhance subordinates workplace safety behaviors? Chen YP; Hsu YS; Panaccio A; Wang H; 40483067
JMSB
5 Searching and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: A systematic assessment of current methods Young S; MacDonald H; Louden D; Ellis UM; Premji Z; Rogers M; Bethel A; Pickup D; 39176233
CONCORDIA
6 Myelin basic protein mRNA levels affect myelin sheath dimensions, architecture, plasticity, and density of resident glial cells Bagheri H; Friedman H; Hadwen A; Jarweh C; Cooper E; Oprea L; Guerrier C; Khadra A; Collin A; Cohen-Adad J; Young A; Victoriano GM; Swire M; Jarjour A; Bechler ME; Pryce RS; Chaurand P; Cougnaud L; Vuckovic D; Wilion E; Greene O; Nishiyama A; Benmamar-Badel A; Owens T; Grouza V; Tuznik M; Liu H; Rudko DA; Zhang J; Siminovitch KA; Peterson AC; 39023138
CSBN
7 The Magical Work of Brand Futurity: The Mythmaking of Disney Jake Pitre 37560617
CONCORDIA
8 How to build up big team science: a practical guide for large-scale collaborations Baumgartner HA; Alessandroni N; Byers-Heinlein K; Frank MC; Hamlin JK; Soderstrom M; Voelkel JG; Willer R; Yuen F; Coles NA; 37293356
PSYCHOLOGY
9 Functional Synthetic Biology Aldulijan I; Beal J; Billerbeck S; Bouffard J; Chambonnier G; Ntelkis N; Guerreiro I; Holub M; Ross P; Selvarajah V; Sprent N; Vidal G; Vignoni A; 37073284
BIOLOGY
10 Who's cooking tonight? A time-use study of coupled adults in Toronto, Canada Liu B; Widener MJ; Smith LG; Farber S; Gesink D; Minaker LM; Patterson Z; Larsen K; Gilliland J; 36339032
ENCS
11 The Value in Science-Art Partnerships for Science Education and Science Communication. Zaelzer C 32616625
CONCORDIA

 

Title:Who's cooking tonight? A time-use study of coupled adults in Toronto, Canada
Authors:Liu BWidener MJSmith LGFarber SGesink DMinaker LMPatterson ZLarsen KGilliland J
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36339032/
DOI:10.1177/0961463X221100696
Publication:Time & society
Keywords:cohabiting partnersfood preparation and cookingfood-related houseworkgendered household labor divisiontime allocation
PMID:36339032 Category: Date Added:2022-11-07
Dept Affiliation: ENCS
1 Department of Geography and Planning, University of Toronto-St George, Toronto, ON, Canada.
2 Department of Human Geography, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada.
3 Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
4 School of Planning, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
5 Concordia Institute of Information Systems Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
6 Department of Geography and Planning, University of Toronto--St George, Toronto, ON, Canada; CAREX Canada, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
7 Department of Geography and Environment, Department of Paediatrics, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health Studies, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Description:

Understanding how coupled adults arrange food-related labor in relation to their daily time allocation is of great importance because different arrangements may have implications for diet-related health and gender equity. Studies from the time-use perspective argue that daily activities such as work, caregiving, and non-food-related housework can potentially compete for time with foodwork. However, studies in this regard are mostly centered on individual-level analyses. They fail to consider cohabiting partners' time spent on foodwork and non-food-related activities, a factor that could be helpful in explaining how coupled partners decide to allocate time to food activities. Using 108 daily time-use logs from seventeen opposite-gender couples living in Toronto, Canada, this paper examines how male and female partners' time spent on non-food-related activities impact the total amount of time spent on foodwork by coupled adults and the difference in time spent on foodwork between coupled women and men. Results show that both male and female partners took a higher portion of foodwork when their partner worked longer. When men worked for additional time, the couple-level duration of foodwork decreased. Without a significant impact on the gender difference in foodwork duration, women's increased caregiving duration was associated with a reduction of total time spent on foodwork by couples. An increase in caregiving and non-food-related chores by men was associated with an increased difference in duration of foodwork between women and men, which helped secure a constant total amount of foodwork at the couple level. These behavioral variations between men and women demonstrate the gender differences in one's responsiveness to the change of partners' non-food-related tasks. The associations found among non-food-related activities and foodwork are suggestive of a need to account for partners' time allocation when studying the time-use dynamics of foodwork and other daily activities.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University