Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Shizgal P" Authored Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Discriminative properties of rewarding electrical brain stimulation Pacheco-Gomez BL; Zepeda-Ruiz WA; Velazquez-Lopez D; Shizgal P; Velazquez-Martinez DN; 40015584
CSBN
2 Does phasic dopamine release cause policy updates? Carter F; Cossette MP; Trujillo-Pisanty I; Pallikaras V; Breton YA; Conover K; Caplan J; Solis P; Voisard J; Yaksich A; Shizgal P; 38039083
PSYCHOLOGY
3 Dopamine and Beyond: Implications of Psychophysical Studies of Intracranial Self-Stimulation for the Treatment of Depression Pallikaras V; Shizgal P; 36009115
PSYCHOLOGY
4 The Convergence Model of Brain Reward Circuitry: Implications for Relief of Treatment-Resistant Depression by Deep-Brain Stimulation of the Medial Forebrain Bundle Pallikaras V; Shizgal P; 35431828
PSYCHOLOGY
5 The trade-off between pulse duration and power in optical excitation of midbrain dopamine neurons approximates Bloch's law Pallikaras V; Carter F; Velazquez-Martinez DN; Arvanitogiannis A; Shizgal P; 34864162
PSYCHOLOGY
6 Dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward. Trujillo-Pisanty I, Conover K, Solis P, Palacios D, Shizgal P 32502210
CSBN
7 The priming effect of food persists following blockade of dopamine receptors. Evangelista C, Hantson A, Shams WM, Almey A, Pileggi M, Voisard JR, Boulos V, Al-Qadri Y, Gonzalez Cautela BV, Zhou FX, Duchemin J, Habrich A, Tito N, Koumrouyan RA, Patel S, Lorenc V, Gagne C, El Oufi K, Shizgal P, Brake WG 31350860
CSBN
8 Learning to use past evidence in a sophisticated world model. Ahilan S, Solomon RB, Breton YA, Conover K, Niyogi RK, Shizgal P, Dayan P 31233559
CSBN
9 Ventral Midbrain NMDA Receptor Blockade: From Enhanced Reward and Dopamine Inactivation. Hernandez G, Cossette MP, Shizgal P, Rompré PP 27616984
PSYCHOLOGY
10 Valuation of opportunity costs by rats working for rewarding electrical brain stimulation. Solomon RB, Conover K, Shizgal P 28841663
PSYCHOLOGY
11 17β-estradiol locally increases phasic dopamine release in the dorsal striatum. Shams WM, Cossette MP, Shizgal P, Brake WG 29175028
CSBN
12 Some work and some play: microscopic and macroscopic approaches to labor and leisure. Niyogi RK, Shizgal P, Dayan P 25474151
CSBN
13 Robust optical fiber patch-cords for in vivo optogenetic experiments in rats. Trujillo-Pisanty I, Sanio C, Chaudhri N, Shizgal P 26150997
CSBN
14 The neural substrates for the rewarding and dopamine-releasing effects of medial forebrain bundle stimulation have partially discrepant frequency responses. Cossette MP, Conover K, Shizgal P 26477378
CSBN
15 The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations. Scardochio T, Trujillo-Pisanty I, Conover K, Shizgal P, Clarke PB 26696851
CSBN

 

Title:Dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward.
Authors:Trujillo-Pisanty IConover KSolis PPalacios DShizgal P
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32502210?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0226722
Publication:PloS one
Keywords:
PMID:32502210 Category:PLoS One Date Added:2020-06-06
Dept Affiliation: CSBN
1 Centre for Studies in Behavioural Neurobiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Description:

Dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward.

PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0226722

Authors: Trujillo-Pisanty I, Conover K, Solis P, Palacios D, Shizgal P

Abstract

The neurobiological study of reward was launched by the discovery of intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS). Subsequent investigation of this phenomenon provided the initial link between reward-seeking behavior and dopaminergic neurotransmission. We re-evaluated this relationship by psychophysical, pharmacological, optogenetic, and computational means. In rats working for direct, optical activation of midbrain dopamine neurons, we varied the strength and opportunity cost of the stimulation and measured time allocation, the proportion of trial time devoted to reward pursuit. We found that the dependence of time allocation on the strength and cost of stimulation was similar formally to that observed when electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle served as the reward. When the stimulation is strong and cheap, the rats devote almost all their time to reward pursuit; time allocation falls off as stimulation strength is decreased and/or its opportunity cost is increased. A 3D plot of time allocation versus stimulation strength and cost produces a surface resembling the corner of a plateau (the "reward mountain"). We show that dopamine-transporter blockade shifts the mountain along both the strength and cost axes in rats working for optical activation of midbrain dopamine neurons. In contrast, the same drug shifted the mountain uniquely along the opportunity-cost axis when rats worked for electrical MFB stimulation in a prior study. Dopamine neurons are an obligatory stage in the dominant model of ICSS, which positions them at a key nexus in the final common path for reward seeking. This model fails to provide a cogent account for the differential effect of dopamine transporter blockade on the reward mountain. Instead, we propose that midbrain dopamine neurons and neurons with non-dopaminergic, MFB axons constitute parallel limbs of brain-reward circuitry that ultimately converge on the final-common path for the evaluation and pursuit of rewards.

PMID: 32502210 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University