Advancing Undergraduate Synthetic Biology Education: Insights from a Canadian iGEM Student Perspective
Authors: Diep P, Boucinha A, Kell BJ, Yeung BA, Chen XA, Tsyplenkov D, Serra D, Escobar A, Gnanapragasam A, Emond CA, Sajtovich VA, Mahadevan R, Kilkenny DM, Gini-Newman G, Kaern M, Ingalls B
Affiliations
1 University of Toronto, 7938, BioZone - Centre for Applied Bioscience and Bioengineering, Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; patrick_diep@outlook.com.
2 University of Toronto, 7938, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education , Toronto, Ontario, Canada; austin.boucinha@mail.utoronto.ca.
3 University of Toronto, 7938, Department of Physics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
4 University of Toronto - Mississauga, 71637, Department of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada; brayden.kell@mail.utoronto.ca.
5 University of Toronto, 7938, Department of Physiology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; biruamy.yeung@mail.utoronto.ca.
6 Queen's University, 4257, School of Medicine, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; amy.chen@queensu.ca.
7 Concordia University, 5618, Centre for Applied Synthetic Biology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; dtsyplen@uwo.
Description
The last two decades have seen vigorous activity in synthetic biology research and ever-increasing applications of its technologies. However, pedagogical research pertaining to teaching synthetic biology is scarce, especially when compared to other science and engineering disciplines. Within Canada there are only three universities that offer synthetic biology programs; two of which are at the undergraduate level. Rather than take place in formal academic settings, many Canadian undergraduate students are introduced to synthetic biology through participation in the annual International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) competition. Although the iGEM competition has had a transformative impact on synthetic biology training in other nations, the impact in Canada has been relatively modest. Consequently, the iGEM competition is still a major setting for synthetic biology education in Canada. To promote further development of synthetic biology education, we surveyed undergraduate students from the Canadian iGEM design teams of 2019. We extracted insights from these data using qualitative analysis to provide recommendations for best teaching practices in synthetic biology undergraduate education, which we describe through our proposed Framework for Transdisciplinary Synthetic Biology Education (FTSBE).
Keywords: biologie synthé; tique; education; enseignement; formation; genetic engineering; gé; nie gé; né; tique; iGEM; pedagogy; pé; dagogie; synthetic biology; teaching;
Links
PubMed: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34237221/
DOI: 10.1139/cjm-2020-0549