Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Methods" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Establishing work productivity loss norms: Absenteeism and presenteeism in a Canadian working population Zhang W; Qian H; L' Heureux J; Johns G; Koehoorn M; Woodcock S; 41469277
JMSB
2 Perceptions et attitudes des personnes âgées souffrant d insomnie par rapport aux médicaments et aux produits de santé naturels Nguyen PV; Dang-Vu T; Forest G; Saidi L; Desmarais P; 40968485
CONCORDIA
3 A portrait of online gambling: a look at a transformation amid a pandemic Kairouz S; Savard AC; Murch WS; Dixon MR; Martin NB; Brodeur M; Dauphinais S; Ferland F; Hamel D; Dufour M; French M; Monson E; Van Mourik V; Morvannou A; 40770758
CONCORDIA
4 Advancements in Magnetorheological Foams: Composition, Fabrication, AI-Driven Enhancements and Emerging Applications Khodaverdi H; Sedaghati R; 40732777
ENCS
5 Exploring interaction paradigms for segmenting medical images in virtual reality Jones Z; Drouin S; Kersten-Oertel M; 40402355
ENCS
6 Facebook recruitment: understanding research relations Prior to data collection Young K; Browne K; 39877298
CONCORDIA
7 Infants' Social Evaluation of Helpers and Hinderers: A Large-Scale, Multi-Lab, Coordinated Replication Study Lucca K; Yuen F; Wang Y; Alessandroni N; Allison O; Alvarez M; Axelsson EL; Baumer J; Baumgartner HA; Bertels J; Bhavsar M; Byers-Heinlein K; Capelier-Mourguy A; Chijiiwa H; Chin CS; Christner N; Cirelli LK; Corbit J; Daum MM; Doan T; Dresel M; Exner A; Fei W; Forbes SH; Franchin L; Frank MC; Geraci A; Giraud M; Gornik ME; Wiesmann CG; Grossmann T; Hadley IM; Havron N; Henderson AME; Matzner EH; Immel BA; Jankiewicz G; Jedryczka W; Kanakogi Y; Kominsky JF; Lew-Williams C; Liberman Z; Liu L; Liu Y; Loeffler MT; Martin A; Mayor J; Meng X; Misiak M; Moreau D; Nencheva ML; Oña LS; Otálora Y; Paulus M; Pepe B; Pickron CB; Powell LJ; Proft M; Quinn AA; Rakoczy H; Reschke PJ; Roth-Hanania R; Rothmaler K; Schlegelmilch K; Schlingloff-Nemecz L; Schmuckler MA; Schuwerk T; Seehagen S; Sen HH; Shainy MR; Silvestri V; Soderstrom M; Sommerville J; Song HJ; Sorokowski P; Stutz SE; Su Y; Taborda-Osorio H; Tan AWM; Tatone D; Taylor-Partridge T; Tsang CKA; Urbanek A; Uzefovsky F; Visser I; Wertz AE; Williams M; Wolsey K; Wong TT; Woodward AM; Wu Y; Zeng Z; Zimmer L; Hamlin JK; 39600132
PSYCHOLOGY
8 Searching and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: A systematic assessment of current methods Young S; MacDonald H; Louden D; Ellis UM; Premji Z; Rogers M; Bethel A; Pickup D; 39176233
CONCORDIA
9 Measuring what matters to older persons for active living: part I content development for the OPAL measure across four countries Mayo NE; Auais M; Barclay R; Branin J; Dawes H; Korfage IJ; Sawchuk K; Tal E; White CL; Ayoubi Z; Chowdhury F; Henderson J; Mansoubi M; Mate KKV; Nadea L; Rodriguez S; Kuspinar A; 38967870
BIOLOGY
10 Evaluation of the effectiveness of a Strengths-Based Nursing and Healthcare Leadership program aimed at building leadership capacity: A concurrent mixed-methods study Lavoie-Tremblay M; Boies K; Clausen C; Frechette J; Manning K; Gelsomini C; Cyr G; Lavigne G; Gottlieb B; Gottlieb LN; 38746801
JMSB
11 Identifying priority questions regarding rapid systematic reviews' methods: protocol for an eDelphi study Vieira AM; Szczepanik G; de Waure C; Tricco AC; Oliver S; Stojanovic J; Ribeiro PAB; Pollock D; Akl EA; Lavis J; Kuchenmuller T; Bragge P; Langer L; Bacon S; 37419644
HKAP
12 How to present work productivity loss results from clinical trials for patients and caregivers? A mixed methods approach L' Heureux J; McTaggart-Cowan H; Johns G; Chen L; Steiner T; Tocher P; Sun H; Zhang W; 37276772
JMSB
13 Barriers and facilitators to diet, physical activity and lifestyle behavior intervention adherence: a qualitative systematic review of the literature Alysha L Deslippe 36782207
PERFORM
14 Pan-Canadian caregiver experiences in accessing government disability programs: A mixed methods study Finlay B; Wittevrongel K; Materula D; Hébert ML; O' Grady K; Lach LM; Nicholas D; Zwicker JD; 36621140
CONCORDIA
15 Double-Bind of Recruitment of Older Adults Into Studies of Successful Aging via Assistive Information and Communication Technologies: Mapping Review Khalili-Mahani N; Sawchuk K; 36563033
CONCORDIA
16 Toward a digital citizen lab for capturing data about alternative ways of self-managing chronic pain: An attitudinal user study Khalili-Mahani N; Woods S; Holowka EM; Pahayahay A; Roy M; 36188996
PERFORM
17 Young women's engagement with gambling: A critical qualitative inquiry of risk conceptualisations and motivations to gamble McCarthy S; Thomas S; Pitt H; Marko S; Randle M; Cowlishaw S; Kairouz S; Daube M; 36002940
SOCANTH
18 Comparison of different severe obesity definitions in predicting future cardiometabolic risk in a longitudinal cohort of children Kakinami L; Smyrnova A; Paradis G; Tremblay A; Henderson M; 35705336
PERFORM
19 A Proposed Multi-Criteria Optimization Approach to Enhance Clinical Outcomes Evaluation for Diabetes Care: A Commentary Wan TTH; Matthews S; Luh H; Zeng Y; Wang Z; Yang L; 35372638
ENCS
20 Simple, Economical Methods for the Culture of Green Algae for Energy Harvesting from Photosynthesis in a Microfluidic Environment Kuruvinashetti K; Rahimi S; Pakkiriswami S; Packirisamy M; 34898042
ENCS
21 Data-driven methods distort optimal cutoffs and accuracy estimates of depression screening tools: a simulation study using individual participant data Bhandari PM; Levis B; Neupane D; Patten SB; Shrier I; Thombs BD; Benedetti A; 33838273
CONCORDIA
22 Overestimation of Postpartum Depression Prevalence Based on a 5-item Version of the EPDS: Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis Thombs BD; Levis B; Lyubenova A; Neupane D; Negeri Z; Wu Y; Sun Y; He C; Krishnan A; Vigod SN; Bhandari PM; Imran M; Rice DB; Azar M; Chiovitti MJ; Saadat N; Riehm KE; Boruff JT; Cuijpers P; Gilbody S; Ioannidis JPA; Kloda LA; Patten SB; Shrier I; Ziegelstein RC; Comeau L; Mitchell ND; Tonelli M; Barnes J; Beck CT; Bindt C; Figueiredo B; Helle N; Howard LM; Kohlhoff J; Kozinszky Z; Leonardou AA; Radoš SN; Quispel C; Rochat TJ; Stein A; Stewart RC; Tadinac M; Tandon SD; Tendais I; Töreki A; Tran TD; Trevillion K; Turner K; Vega-Dienstmaier JM; Benedetti A; 33104415
LIBRARY
23 A threshold LC-MS/MS method for 92 analytes in oral fluid collected with the Quantisal® device Desharnais B; Lajoie MJ; Laquerre J; Mireault P; Skinner CD; 33035929
CHEMBIOCHEM
24 Group sample sizes in nonregulated health care intervention trials described as randomized controlled trials were overly similar Thombs BD; Levis AW; Azar M; Saadat N; Riehm KE; Sanchez TA; Chiovitti MJ; Rice DB; Levis B; Fedoruk C; Lyubenova A; Malo Vázquez de Lara AL; Kloda LA; Benedetti A; Shrier I; Platt RW; Kimmelman J; 31866472
LIBRARY

 

Title:Identifying priority questions regarding rapid systematic reviews' methods: protocol for an eDelphi study
Authors:Vieira AMSzczepanik Gde Waure CTricco ACOliver SStojanovic JRibeiro PABPollock DAkl EALavis JKuchenmuller TBragge PLanger LBacon S
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37419644/
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069856
Publication:BMJ open
Keywords:health economicshealth policypublic healthstatistics &research methods
PMID:37419644 Category: Date Added:2023-07-08
Dept Affiliation: HKAP
1 Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
2 Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
3 Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
4 Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
5 University College London Institute of Education, London, UK.
6 Health Evidence Synthesis, Recommendations and Impact, School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
7 Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
8 Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
9 McMaster Health Forum and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
10 Affiliate Scientist, Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
11 Research for Health Department,Science Division, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
12 Monash Sustainable Development Institute Evidence Review Service, BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
13 South Africa Centre for Evidence, Johannesburg, South Africa.
14 Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, Canada simon.bacon@concordia.ca.

Description:

Introduction: Rapid systematic reviews (RRs) have the potential to provide timely information to decision-makers, thus directly impacting healthcare. However, consensus regarding the most efficient approaches to performing RRs and the presence of several unaddressed methodological issues pose challenges. With such a large potential research agenda for RRs, it is unclear what should be prioritised.

Objective: To elicit a consensus from RR experts and interested parties on what are the most important methodological questions (from the generation of the question to the writing of the report) for the field to address in order to guide the effective and efficient development of RRs.

Methods and analysis: An eDelphi study will be conducted. Researchers with experience in evidence synthesis and other interested parties (eg, knowledge users, patients, community members, policymaker, industry, journal editors and healthcare providers) will be invited to participate. The following steps will be taken: (1) a core group of experts in evidence synthesis will generate the first list of items based on the available literature; (2) using LimeSurvey, participants will be invited to rate and rank the importance of suggested RR methodological questions. Questions with open format responses will allow for modifications to the wording of items or the addition of new items; (3) three survey rounds will be performed asking participants to re-rate items, with items deemed of low importance being removed at each round; (4) a list of items will be generated with items believed to be of high importance by =75% of participants being included and (5) this list will be discussed at an online consensus meeting that will generate a summary document containing the final priority list. Data analysis will be performed using raw numbers, means and frequencies.

Ethics and dissemination: This study was approved by the Concordia University Human Research Ethics Committee (#30015229). Both traditional, for example, scientific conference presentations and publication in scientific journals, and non-traditional, for example, lay summaries and infographics, knowledge translation products will be created.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University