Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Finite element" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 3D bioheat transfer mapping reveals nanomagnetic particles effectiveness in radiofrequency hyperthermia breast cancer treatment comparing to experimental study Kavousi M; Saadatmand E; Masoumbeigi M; Mahdavi R; Riyahi Alam N; 39557504
PHYSICS
2 Investigation of Macroscopic Mechanical Behavior of Magnetorheological Elastomers under Shear Deformation Using Microscale Representative Volume Element Approach Abdollahi I; Sedaghati R; 38794567
ENCS
3 Design Optimization of a Hybrid-Driven Soft Surgical Robot with Biomimetic Constraints Roshanfar M; Dargahi J; Hooshiar A; 38275456
ENCS
4 On the soft tissue ultrasound elastography using FEM based inversion approach Eshaghinia SS; Taghvaeipour A; Aghdam MM; Rivaz H; 38240143
ENCS
5 The influence of inter-bubble spacing on the resonance response of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles Yusefi H; Helfield B; 36223708
BIOLOGY
6 Optical Fiber Array Sensor for Force Estimation and Localization in TAVI Procedure: Design, Modeling, Analysis and Validation Bandari N; Dargahi J; Packirisamy M; 34450813
ENCS
7 Finite Element Modelling of a Reflection Differential Split-D Eddy Current Probe Scanning Surface Notches. Mohseni E, França DR, Viens M, Xie WF, Xu B 32214578
ENCS
8 Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy Inference System Trained for Sizing Semi-elliptical Notches Scanned by Eddy Currents. Mohseni E, Viens M, Xie WF 31929668
ENCS
9 Influence of Head Tissue Conductivity Uncertainties on EEG Dipole Reconstruction. Vorwerk J, Aydin Ü, Wolters CH, Butson CR 31231178
PERFORM
10 Zoomed MRI Guided by Combined EEG/MEG Source Analysis: A Multimodal Approach for Optimizing Presurgical Epilepsy Work-up and its Application in a Multi-focal Epilepsy Patient Case Study. Aydin Ü, Rampp S, Wollbrink A, Kugel H, Cho J-, Knösche TR, Grova C, Wellmer J, Wolters CH 28510905
PERFORM

 

Title:Influence of Head Tissue Conductivity Uncertainties on EEG Dipole Reconstruction.
Authors:Vorwerk JAydin ÜWolters CHButson CR
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31231178?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.3389/fnins.2019.00531
Publication:Frontiers in neuroscience
Keywords:EEG dipole reconstructionEEG source analysisconductivity estimationconductivity uncertaintyfinite element methodgeneralized polynomial chaoshead modelingsensitivity analysis
PMID:31231178 Category:Front Neurosci Date Added:2019-06-25
Dept Affiliation: PERFORM
1 Scientific Computing & Imaging (SCI) Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
2 Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
3 Institute of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
4 Multimodal Functional Imaging Lab, Department of Physics and PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
5 Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
6 Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Neurology, and Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
7 Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

Description:

Influence of Head Tissue Conductivity Uncertainties on EEG Dipole Reconstruction.

Front Neurosci. 2019;13:531

Authors: Vorwerk J, Aydin Ü, Wolters CH, Butson CR

Abstract

Reliable EEG source analysis depends on sufficiently detailed and accurate head models. In this study, we investigate how uncertainties inherent to the experimentally determined conductivity values of the different conductive compartments influence the results of EEG source analysis. In a single source scenario, the superficial and focal somatosensory P20/N20 component, we analyze the influence of varying conductivities on dipole reconstructions using a generalized polynomial chaos (gPC) approach. We find that in particular the conductivity uncertainties for skin and skull have a significant influence on the EEG inverse solution, leading to variations in source localization by several centimeters. The conductivity uncertainties for gray and white matter were found to have little influence on the source localization, but a strong influence on the strength and orientation of the reconstructed source, respectively. As the CSF conductivity is most accurately determined of all conductivities in a realistic head model, CSF conductivity uncertainties had a negligible influence on the source reconstruction. This small uncertainty is a further benefit of distinguishing the CSF in realistic volume conductor models.

PMID: 31231178 [PubMed]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University