Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Deroche MLD" Authored Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Use of a difference in fundamental frequency and spatial location beyond intelligibility purposes Adams R; Deroche MLD; 41263630
PSYCHOLOGY
2 Speech, Timbre, and Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users With Flat-Panel CT-Based Frequency Reallocations: A Longitudinal Prospective Study Gilbert ML; Lewis RM; Deroche MLD; Jiam NT; Jiradejvong P; Mo J; Cooke DL; Limb CJ; 40689899
PSYCHOLOGY
3 The neural characteristics influencing literacy outcome in children with cochlear implants Koirala N; Manning J; Neumann S; Anderson C; Deroche MLD; Wolfe J; Pugh K; Landi N; Muthuraman M; Gracco VL; 40046341
PSYCHOLOGY
4 Cross-modal plasticity in children with cochlear implant: converging evidence from EEG and functional near-infrared spectroscopy Deroche MLD; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Manning J; Hanna L; Towler W; Wilson C; Bien AG; Miller S; Schafer E; Gemignani J; Alemi R; Muthuraman M; Koirala N; Gracco VL; 38846536
PSYCHOLOGY
5 Dynamic networks differentiate the language ability of children with cochlear implants Koirala N; Deroche MLD; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Bien AG; Doan D; Goldbeck M; Muthuraman M; Gracco VL; 37409105
PSYCHOLOGY
6 Grouping by Time and Pitch Facilitates Free but Not Cued Recall for Word Lists in Normally-Hearing Listeners Sares AG; Gilbert AC; Zhang Y; Iordanov M; Lehmann A; Deroche MLD; 37338981
PSYCHOLOGY
7 Visual biases in evaluation of speakers' and singers' voice type by cis and trans listeners Marchand Knight J; Sares AG; Deroche MLD; 37205083
PSYCHOLOGY
8 Auditory evoked response to an oddball paradigm in children wearing cochlear implants Deroche MLD; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Manning J; Towler W; Alemi R; Bien AG; Koirala N; Hanna L; Henry L; Gracco VL; 36965466
PSYCHOLOGY
9 Luminance effects on pupil dilation in speech-in-noise recognition Zhang Y; Malaval F; Lehmann A; Deroche MLD; 36459511
PSYCHOLOGY
10 Predicting emotion perception abilities for cochlear implant users Paquette S; Deroche MLD; Goffi-Gomez MV; Hoshino ACH; Lehmann A; 36047767
PSYCHOLOGY
11 Specificity of Affective Responses in Misophonia Depends on Trigger Identification Savard MA; Sares AG; Coffey EBJ; Deroche MLD; 35692416
PSYCHOLOGY
12 Cochlear Implant Compression Optimization for Musical Sound Quality in MED-EL Users Gilbert ML; Deroche MLD; Jiradejvong P; Chan Barrett K; Limb CJ; 34812791
PSYCHOLOGY
13 Adaptation to pitch-altered feedback is independent of one's own voice pitch sensitivity. Alemi R, Lehmann A, Deroche MLD 33033324
PSYCHOLOGY
14 Neural Correlates of Vocal Pitch Compensation in Individuals Who Stutter. Sares AG, Deroche MLD, Ohashi H, Shiller DM, Gracco VL 32161525
PSYCHOLOGY
15 Perception of Child-Directed Versus Adult-Directed Emotional Speech in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users. Barrett KC, Chatterjee M, Caldwell MT, Deroche MLD, Jiradejvong P, Kulkarni AM, Limb CJ 32149924
PSYCHOLOGY
16 Processing of Acoustic Information in Lexical Tone Production and Perception by Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients. Deroche MLD, Lu HP, Lin YS, Chatterjee M, Peng SC 31281237
PSYCHOLOGY

 

Title:Luminance effects on pupil dilation in speech-in-noise recognition
Authors:Zhang YMalaval FLehmann ADeroche MLD
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36459511/
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0278506
Publication:PloS one
Keywords:
PMID:36459511 Category: Date Added:2022-12-02
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Department of Otolaryngology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
2 Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music, Montreal, Canada.
3 Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology, Montreal, Canada.
4 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.

Description:

There is an increasing interest in the field of audiology and speech communication to measure the effort that it takes to listen in noisy environments, with obvious implications for populations suffering from hearing loss. Pupillometry offers one avenue to make progress in this enterprise but important methodological questions remain to be addressed before such tools can serve practical applications. Typically, cocktail-party situations may occur in less-than-ideal lighting conditions, e.g. a pub or a restaurant, and it is unclear how robust pupil dynamics are to luminance changes. In this study, we first used a well-known paradigm where sentences were presented at different signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), all conducive of good intelligibility. This enabled us to replicate findings, e.g. a larger and later peak pupil dilation (PPD) at adverse SNR, or when the sentences were misunderstood, and to investigate the dependency of the PPD on sentence duration. A second experiment reiterated two of the SNR levels, 0 and +14 dB, but measured at 0, 75, and 220 lux. The results showed that the impact of luminance on the SNR effect was non-monotonic (sub-optimal in darkness or in bright light), and as such, there is no trivial way to derive pupillary metrics that are robust to differences in background light, posing considerable constraints for applications of pupillometry in daily life. Our findings raise an under-examined but crucial issue when designing and understanding listening effort studies using pupillometry, and offer important insights to future clinical application of pupillometry across sites.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University