Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Coffey EBJ" Authored Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Nightly variations in sleep quality and next-day cognitive performance: an in-home study in healthy older adults Brooks M; El Chami R; Jourde HR; Savard MA; Coffey EBJ; 41878310
PSYCHOLOGY
2 Modulating sleep: slow oscillation and spindle stimulation effects on physiology and memory Jourde HR; Sita KZ; Eyqvelle Z; Brooks M; Coffey EBJ; 41559130
CONCORDIA
3 The effectiveness of auditory stimulation in sleep varies with thalamocortical spindle phase Jourde HR; Ujevco A; Coffey EBJ; 41110657
CONCORDIA
4 Exploring Deep Magnetoencephalography via Thalamo-Cortical Sleep Spindles Rattray GF; Jourde HR; Baillet S; Coffey EBJ; 41002111
PSYCHOLOGY
5 Sleep state influences early sound encoding at cortical but not subcortical levels Jourde HR; Coffey EBJ; 40623839
PSYCHOLOGY
6 Neurophysiological effects of targeting sleep spindles with closed-loop auditory stimulation Jourde HR; Sobral M; Beltrame G; Coffey EBJ; 40626105
PSYCHOLOGY
7 Personalizing brain stimulation: continual learning for sleep spindle detection Sobral M; Jourde HR; Marjani Bajestani SE; Coffey EBJ; Beltrame G; 40609549
PSYCHOLOGY
8 Sound degradation type differentially affects neural indicators of cognitive workload and speech tracking Gagné N; Greenlaw KM; Coffey EBJ; 40412301
PSYCHOLOGY
9 Auditory working memory mechanisms mediating the relationship between musicianship and auditory stream segregation Liu M; Arseneau-Bruneau I; Farrés Franch M; Latorre ME; Samuels J; Issa E; Payumo A; Rahman N; Loureiro N; Leung TCM; Nave KM; von Handorf KM; Hoddinott JD; Coffey EBJ; Grahn J; Zatorre RJ; 40226491
PSYCHOLOGY
10 Toward cognitive models of misophonia Savard MA; Coffey EBJ; 39874936
PSYCHOLOGY
11 Auditory processing up to cortex is maintained during sleep spindles Jourde HR; Coffey EBJ; 39588317
PSYCHOLOGY
12 Challenges and Approaches in the Study of Neural Entrainment Duecker K; Doelling KB; Breska A; Coffey EBJ; Sivarao DV; Zoefel B; 39358026
CONCORDIA
13 Cortical-subcortical interactions underlie processing of auditory predictions measured with 7T fMRI Ara A; Provias V; Sitek K; Coffey EBJ; Zatorre RJ; 39087881
PSYCHOLOGY
14 Approaches to studying emotion using physiological responses to spoken narratives: A scoping review Savard MA; Merlo R; Samithamby A; Paas A; Coffey EBJ; 38961524
PSYCHOLOGY
15 Overcoming boundaries: Interdisciplinary challenges and opportunities in cognitive neuroscience Brignol A; Paas A; Sotelo-Castro L; St-Onge D; Beltrame G; Coffey EBJ; 38750788
PSYCHOLOGY
16 The neurophysiology of closed-loop auditory stimulation in sleep: A magnetoencephalography study Jourde HR; Merlo R; Brooks M; Rowe M; Coffey EBJ; 37675803
CONCORDIA
17 Decoding of Envelope vs. Fundamental Frequency During Complex Auditory Stream Segregation Greenlaw KM; Puschmann S; Coffey EBJ; 37215227
PSYCHOLOGY
18 The Portiloop: A deep learning-based open science tool for closed-loop brain stimulation Valenchon N; Bouteiller Y; Jourde HR; L' Heureux X; Sobral M; Coffey EBJ; Beltrame G; 35994482
CONCORDIA
19 Sleep affects higher-level categorization of speech sounds, but not frequency encoding Chapelle A; Savard MA; Restani R; Ghaemmaghami P; Thillou N; Zardoui K; Chandrasekaran B; Coffey EBJ; 35732089
PSYCHOLOGY
20 Sigma oscillations protect or reinstate motor memory depending on their temporal coordination with slow waves Nicolas J; King BR; Levesque D; Lazzouni L; Coffey EBJ; Swinnen S; Doyon J; Carrier J; Albouy G; 35726850
PSYCHOLOGY
21 Specificity of Affective Responses in Misophonia Depends on Trigger Identification Savard MA; Sares AG; Coffey EBJ; Deroche MLD; 35692416
PSYCHOLOGY
22 Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response. Coffey EBJ, Nicol T, White-Schwoch T, Chandrasekaran B, Krizman J, Skoe E, Zatorre RJ, Kraus N 31695046
PSYCHOLOGY
23 Expedition Cognition: A Review and Prospective of Subterranean Neuroscience With Spaceflight Applications. Mogilever NB, Zuccarelli L, Burles F, Iaria G, Strapazzon G, Bessone L, Coffey EBJ 30425628
PSYCHOLOGY
24 The Music-In-Noise Task (MINT): A Tool for Dissecting Complex Auditory Perception. Coffey EBJ, Arseneau-Bruneau I, Zhang X, Zatorre RJ 30930734
PSYCHOLOGY

 

Title:Cortical-subcortical interactions underlie processing of auditory predictions measured with 7T fMRI
Authors:Ara AProvias VSitek KCoffey EBJZatorre RJ
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39087881/
DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhae316
Publication:Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
Keywords:abstract rulesauditory expectancycortical-subcortical interactionshigh-field fMRIpredictive coding
PMID:39087881 Category: Date Added:2024-08-01
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada.
2 International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research (BRAMS), 90 Vincent-d'Indy Avenue, Outremont, QC H2V 2S9, Canada.
3 Centre for Research in Brain, Language and Music (CRBLM), 3640 de la Montagne Street, Montreal, QC H3G 2A8, Canada.
4 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QCH4B 1R6, Canada.
5 Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, 60208 IL, USA.

Description:

Perception integrates both sensory inputs and internal models of the environment. In the auditory domain, predictions play a critical role because of the temporal nature of sounds. However, the precise contribution of cortical and subcortical structures in these processes and their interaction remain unclear. It is also unclear whether these brain interactions are specific to abstract rules or if they also underlie the predictive coding of local features. We used high-field 7T functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate interactions between cortical and subcortical areas during auditory predictive processing. Volunteers listened to tone sequences in an oddball paradigm where the predictability of the deviant was manipulated. Perturbations in periodicity were also introduced to test the specificity of the response. Results indicate that both cortical and subcortical auditory structures encode high-order predictive dynamics, with the effect of predictability being strongest in the auditory cortex. These predictive dynamics were best explained by modeling a top-down information flow, in contrast to unpredicted responses. No error signals were observed to deviations of periodicity, suggesting that these responses are specific to abstract rule violations. Our results support the idea that the high-order predictive dynamics observed in subcortical areas propagate from the auditory cortex.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University