Reset filters

Search publications


Search by keyword
List by department / centre / faculty

No publications found.

 

The Many Nuanced Evolutionary Consequences of Duplicated Genes.

Authors: Teufel AIJohnson MMLaurent JMKachroo AHMarcotte EMWilke CO


Affiliations

1 Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
2 Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
3 Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
4 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Institute for Systems Genetics, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
5 The Department of Biology, Centre for Applied Synthetic Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Description

The Many Nuanced Evolutionary Consequences of Duplicated Genes.

Mol Biol Evol. 2019 02 01;36(2):304-314

Authors: Teufel AI, Johnson MM, Laurent JM, Kachroo AH, Marcotte EM, Wilke CO

Abstract

Gene duplication is seen as a major source of structural and functional divergence in genome evolution. Under the conventional models of sub or neofunctionalization, functional changes arise in one of the duplicates after duplication. However, we suggest here that the presence of a duplicated gene can result in functional changes to its interacting partners. We explore this hypothesis by in silico evolution of a heterodimer when one member of the interacting pair is duplicated. We examine how a range of selection pressures and protein structures leads to differential patterns of evolutionary divergence. We find that a surprising number of distinct evolutionary trajectories can be observed even in a simple three member system. Further, we observe that selection to correct dosage imbalance can affect the evolution of the initial function in several unexpected ways. For example, if a duplicate is under selective pressure to avoid binding its original binding partner, this can lead to changes in the binding interface of a nonduplicated interacting partner to exclude the duplicate. Hence, independent of the fate of the duplicate, its presence can impact how the original function operates. Additionally, we introduce a conceptual framework to describe how interacting partners cope with dosage imbalance after duplication. Contextualizing our results within this framework reveals that the evolutionary path taken by a duplicate's interacting partners is highly stochastic in nature. Consequently, the fate of duplicate genes may not only be controlled by their own ability to accumulate mutations but also by how interacting partners cope with them.

PMID: 30428072 [PubMed - in process]


Links

PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30428072?dopt=Abstract

DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msy210