Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"survey" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 A portrait of online gambling: a look at a transformation amid a pandemic Kairouz S; Savard AC; Murch WS; Dixon MR; Martin NB; Brodeur M; Dauphinais S; Ferland F; Hamel D; Dufour M; French M; Monson E; Van Mourik V; Morvannou A; 40770758
CONCORDIA
2 Prioritising methodological research questions for scoping reviews, mapping reviews and evidence and gap maps for health research: a protocol for PROSPECT Delphi study Pollock D; Hasanoff S; McBride G; Kanukula R; Tricco AC; Khalil H; Campbell F; Jia RM; Alexander L; Peters M; Vieira AM; Aromataris E; Nunn J; Saran A; Evans C; Godfrey C; Pieper D; de Moraes ÉB; Biesty L; Colquhoun H; Devane D; Toomey E; Clyne B; Davies E; Munn Z; 40759523
SOH
3 Family dysfunction, stressful life events, and mental health problems across development in the offspring of parents with an affective disorder Resendes T; Ellenbogen MA; Oldehinkel AJ; 38682166
PSYCHOLOGY
4 Understanding Adolescents' Experiences With Menstrual Pain to Inform the User-Centered Design of a Mindfulness-Based App: Mixed Methods Investigation Study Gagnon MM; Brilz AR; Alberts NM; Gordon JL; Risling TL; Stinson JN; 38587886
PSYCHOLOGY
5 Prevalence and Motivators of Getting a COVID-19 Booster Vaccine in Canada: Results from the iCARE Study Léger C; Deslauriers F; Gosselin Boucher V; Phillips M; Bacon SL; Lavoie KL; 36851169
HKAP
6 Single Digit Index Finger Amputation-To Replant or Not? Thibedeau M; Ramji M; McKenzie M; Yeung J; Nickerson DA; 36755823
BIOLOGY
7 Gamblers' Perceptions of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Their Gambling Behaviours: Analysis of Free-Text Responses Collected through a Cross-Sectional Online Survey Renard M; Audette-Chapdelaine S; Savard AC; Kairouz S; Brodeur M; 36554483
PSYCHOLOGY
8 Patient and family engagement in patient care and research in Canadian intensive care units: a national survey Burns KEA; McDonald E; Debigaré S; Zamir N; Vasquez M; Piche-Ayotte M; Oczkowski S; 36344874
BIOLOGY
9 Toward a digital citizen lab for capturing data about alternative ways of self-managing chronic pain: An attitudinal user study Khalili-Mahani N; Woods S; Holowka EM; Pahayahay A; Roy M; 36188996
PERFORM
10 Measuring workplace psychosocial factors in the federal government Blais AR; Michaud I; Simard JF; Mach L; Houle S; 35044739
CONCORDIA
11 Global Trends and Correlates of COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy: Findings from the iCARE Study Stojanovic J; Boucher VG; Gagne M; Gupta S; Joyal-Desmarais K; Paduano S; Aburub AS; Sheinfeld Gorin SN; Kassianos AP; Ribeiro PAB; Bacon SL; Lavoie KL; 34204379
HKAP
12 Knowledge, Attitude, and Self-Reported Practice Towards Measures for Prevention of the Spread of COVID-19 Among Australians: A Nationwide Online Longitudinal Representative Survey Enticott J; Slifirski W; Lavoie KL; Bacon SL; Teede HJ; Boyle JA; 34150696
HKAP
13 A threshold LC-MS/MS method for 92 analytes in oral fluid collected with the Quantisal® device Desharnais B; Lajoie MJ; Laquerre J; Mireault P; Skinner CD; 33035929
CHEMBIOCHEM
14 What Media Helps, What Media Hurts: A Mixed Methods Survey Study of Coping with COVID-19 Using the Media Repertoire Framework and the Appraisal Theory of Stress Pahayahay A; Khalili-Mahani N; 32701459
PERFORM
15 Evaluating Public Health Interventions: A Neglected Area in Health Technology Assessment. Stojanovic J, Wübbeler M, Geis S, Reviriego E, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I, Lenoir-Wijnkoop I 32391300
HKAP
16 Adolescent media use and its association to wellbeing in a Canadian national sample. Fitzpatrick C, Burkhalter R, Asbridge M 31024788
PERFORM

 

Title:Evaluating Public Health Interventions: A Neglected Area in Health Technology Assessment.
Authors:Stojanovic JWübbeler MGeis SReviriego EGutiérrez-Ibarluzea ILenoir-Wijnkoop I
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32391300?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00106
Publication:Frontiers in public health
Keywords:HTAat-risk populationsinterventionlifestyle and behaviorpublic healthsurveytechnology
PMID:32391300 Category:Front Public Health Date Added:2020-05-12
Dept Affiliation: HKAP
1 Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
2 Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-De-L'Île-De-Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
3 Department of Nursing Science, Hochschule für Gesundheit-University of Applied Sciences, Bochum, Germany.
4 Osteba, Basque Office for Technology Assessment, Basque Foundation for Health Innovation and Research (BIOEF), Bilbao, Spain.
5 Basque Foundation for Health Innovation and Research (BIOEF), Bilbao, Spain.
6 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Description:

Evaluating Public Health Interventions: A Neglected Area in Health Technology Assessment.

Front Public Health. 2020;8:106

Authors: Stojanovic J, Wübbeler M, Geis S, Reviriego E, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I, Lenoir-Wijnkoop I

Abstract

Introduction: Public health (PH) interventions are crucial for ensuring sustainable healthcare services. Nevertheless, they represent a neglected area in the field of health technology assessment (HTA) due to various methodological issues and their complex design that goes beyond clinical setting. The present study provides an environmental scan of HTA initiatives related to the assessment of PH technologies on a global level. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 85 HTA-related European and international societies, health bodies, and networks from September 2018 to January 2019. The questionnaire contained four sections and 18 questions regarding activities related to the evaluation of PH technologies, information on existing PH technologies, and methodologies of assessment as well as barriers and facilitators to reaching a decision and implementing a PH technology. Results: Among 52 survey responses, the majority of the respondents came from European countries (35%), followed by North American (27%), and South American (19%) countries. The main type of organizations covered by our survey included HTA agencies, public administrations, and research institutes. Seventy-one % of the institutions reported engagement in any aspect of HTA in the area of PH (N = 37). Among those, 81% evaluated less than 5 PH technologies from 2013 to 2018. The most common barriers for reaching a decision on PH technologies were lack of data, conflicting stakeholder priorities, and methodological issues. A total of 76 PH interventions were reported, and most cited initiatives were related to chronic disease screening, prevention of infectious diseases, and maternal, prenatal, and neonatal screening. Conclusion: Our survey reported a rather limited involvement of HTA in the evaluation of PH technologies. In particular, an evaluation of behavioral and lifestyle interventions remains extremely rare. The implementation of collaborative HTA approaches in the setting of PH practice and policy needs to be prioritized and further strengthened. Moreover, ensuring reliable data structures and consolidation of HTA methods for the evaluation of PH technologies will be crucial for tackling the enormous burden of non-communicable diseases in societies.

PMID: 32391300 [PubMed]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University