Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"self-compassion" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Development of the Japanese Version of the State Self-Compassion Scale (SSCS-J) Miyagawa Y; Tóth-Király I; Knox MC; Taniguchi J; Niiya Y; 35095662
PSYCHOLOGY
2 Is Self-Compassion Universal? Support for the Measurement Invariance of the Self-Compassion Scale Across Populations. Tóth-Király I, Neff KD 32475146
CONCORDIA
3 Body image-related cognitive fusion and disordered eating: the role of self-compassion and sad mood. Scardera S, Sacco S, Di Sante J, Booij L 32086789
PSYCHOLOGY
4 The Development and Validation of the Compassion Scale. Pommier E, Neff KD, Tóth-Király I 31516024
CONCORDIA
5 Self-compassion, chronic age-related stressors, and diurnal cortisol secretion in older adulthood Heather Herriot 29948541
PSYCHOLOGY

 

Title:The Development and Validation of the Compassion Scale.
Authors:Pommier E,  Neff KD,  Tóth-Király I
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31516024?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.1177/1073191119874108
Publication:Assessment
Keywords:Compassion Scale;  Self-Compassion Scale;  bifactor analyses;  compassion;  exploratory structural equation modeling;  self-compassion; 
PMID:31516024 Category:Assessment Date Added:2019-09-14
Dept Affiliation: CONCORDIA
1 University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
2 Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Description:

The Development and Validation of the Compassion Scale.

Assessment. 2019 Sep 13;:1073191119874108

Authors: Pommier E, Neff KD, Tóth-Király I

Abstract

This article presents a measure of compassion for others called the Compassion Scale (CS), which is based on Neff's theoretical model of self-compassion. Compassion was operationalized as experiencing kindness, a sense of common humanity, mindfulness, and lessened indifference toward the suffering of others. Study 1 (n = 465) describes the development of potential scale items and the final 16 CS items chosen based on results from analyses using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling. Study 2 (n = 510) cross-validates the CS in a second student sample. Study 3 (n = 80) establishes test-retest reliability. Study 4 (n = 1,394) replicates results with a community sample, while Study 5 (n = 172) replicates results with a sample of meditators. Study 6 (n = 913) examines the finalized version of the CS in a community sample. Evidence regarding reliability, discriminant, convergent, construct, and known-groups validity for the CS is provided.

PMID: 31516024 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]




BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University