Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"paraspinal muscles" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Comparison of Combined Motor Control Training and Isolated Extensor Strengthening Versus General Exercise on Lumbar Paraspinal Muscle Health and Associations With Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Rosenstein B; Rye M; Roussac A; Naghdi N; Macedo LG; Elliott J; DeMont R; Weber MH; Pepin V; Dover G; Fortin M; 40066720
SOH
2 The assessment of paraspinal muscle epimuscular fat in participants with and without low back pain: A case-control study Rosenstein B; Burdick J; Roussac A; Rye M; Naghdi N; Valentin S; Licka T; Sean M; Tétreault P; Elliott J; Fortin M; 38280825
HKAP
3 Thresholding approaches for estimating paraspinal muscle fat infiltration using T1- and T2-weighted MRI: Comparative analysis using water-fat MRI Ornowski J; Dziesinski L; Hess M; Krug R; Fortin M; Torres-Espin A; Majumdar S; Pedoia V; Bonnheim NB; Bailey JF; 38222819
HKAP
4 The Effects of Combined Motor Control and Isolated Extensor Strengthening versus General Exercise on Paraspinal Muscle Morphology, Composition, and Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Fortin M; Rye M; Roussac A; Montpetit C; Burdick J; Naghdi N; Rosenstein B; Bertrand C; Macedo LG; Elliott JM; Dover G; DeMont R; Weber MH; Pepin V; 37762861
PERFORM
5 Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group Hodges PW; Bailey JF; Fortin M; Battié MC; 34542672
HKAP
6 Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Characteristics, Body Composition, and Injury in University Rugby Players Lévesque J; Rivaz H; Rizk A; Frenette S; Boily M; Fortin M; 32997748
PERFORM
7 Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of the Cervical Spine Extensor Muscles: Intrarater and Interrater Reliability of a Novice and an Experienced Rater. Fortin M, Dobrescu O, Jarzem P, Ouellet J, Weber MH 29503688
PERFORM
8 Population-averaged MRI atlases for automated image processing and assessments of lumbar paraspinal muscles. Xiao Y, Fortin M, Battié MC, Rivaz H 30051147
PERFORM

 

Title:Thresholding approaches for estimating paraspinal muscle fat infiltration using T1- and T2-weighted MRI: Comparative analysis using water-fat MRI
Authors:Ornowski JDziesinski LHess MKrug RFortin MTorres-Espin AMajumdar SPedoia VBonnheim NBBailey JF
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38222819/
DOI:10.1002/jsp2.1301
Publication:JOR spine
Keywords:MRIfat infiltrationlow back painmuscle qualityparaspinal musclesthresholdingwater-fat MRI
PMID:38222819 Category: Date Added:2024-01-15
Dept Affiliation: HKAP
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of California San Francisco California USA.
2 Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging University of California San Francisco California USA.
3 Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Applied Physiology Concordia University Montreal Québec Canada.
4 School of Public Health Sciences Faculty of Health University of Waterloo Waterloo Ontario Canada.
5 Department of Physical Therapy University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.
6 Department of Neurological Surgery University of California San Francisco California USA.

Description:

Background: Paraspinal muscle fat infiltration is associated with spinal degeneration and low back pain, however, quantifying muscle fat using clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques continues to be a challenge. Advanced MRI techniques, including chemical-shift encoding (CSE) based water-fat MRI, enable accurate measurement of muscle fat, but such techniques are not widely available in routine clinical practice.

Methods: To facilitate assessment of paraspinal muscle fat using clinical imaging, we compared four thresholding approaches for estimating muscle fat fraction (FF) using T1- and T2-weighted images, with measurements from water-fat MRI as the ground truth: Gaussian thresholding, Otsu's method, K-mean clustering, and quadratic discriminant analysis. Pearson's correlation coefficients (r), mean absolute errors, and mean bias errors were calculated for FF estimates from T1- and T2-weighted MRI with water-fat MRI for the lumbar multifidus (MF), erector spinae (ES), quadratus lumborum (QL), and psoas (PS), and for all muscles combined.

Results: We found that for all muscles combined, FF measurements from T1- and T2-weighted images were strongly positively correlated with measurements from the water-fat images for all thresholding techniques (r = 0.70-0.86, p < 0.0001) and that variations in inter-muscle correlation strength were much greater than variations in inter-method correlation strength.

Conclusion: We conclude that muscle FF can be quantified using thresholded T1- and T2-weighted MRI images with relatively low bias and absolute error in relation to water-fat MRI, particularly in the MF and ES, and the choice of thresholding technique should depend on the muscle and clinical MRI sequence of interest.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University