| Keyword search (4,163 papers available) | ![]() |
"neural networks" Keyword-tagged Publications:
| Title | Authors | PubMed ID | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tuning Deep Learning for Predicting Aluminum Prices Under Different Sampling: Bayesian Optimization Versus Random Search | Alicia Estefania Antonio Figueroa | 41751647 CONCORDIA |
| 2 | Distinguishing Between Healthy and Unhealthy Newborns Based on Acoustic Features and Deep Learning Neural Networks Tuned by Bayesian Optimization and Random Search Algorithm | Lahmiri S; Tadj C; Gargour C; | 41294952 ENCS |
| 3 | Efficient neural encoding as revealed by bilingualism | Moore C; Donhauser PW; Klein D; Byers-Heinlein K; | 40828024 PSYCHOLOGY |
| 4 | Personalizing brain stimulation: continual learning for sleep spindle detection | Sobral M; Jourde HR; Marjani Bajestani SE; Coffey EBJ; Beltrame G; | 40609549 PSYCHOLOGY |
| 5 | Parallel boosting neural network with mutual information for day-ahead solar irradiance forecasting | Ahmed U; Mahmood A; Khan AR; Kuhlmann L; Alimgeer KS; Razzaq S; Aziz I; Hammad A; | 40185800 PHYSICS |
| 6 | Large language models deconstruct the clinical intuition behind diagnosing autism | Stanley J; Rabot E; Reddy S; Belilovsky E; Mottron L; Bzdok D; | 40147442 ENCS |
| 7 | MuscleMap: An Open-Source, Community-Supported Consortium for Whole-Body Quantitative MRI of Muscle | McKay MJ; Weber KA; Wesselink EO; Smith ZA; Abbott R; Anderson DB; Ashton-James CE; Atyeo J; Beach AJ; Burns J; Clarke S; Collins NJ; Coppieters MW; Cornwall J; Crawford RJ; De Martino E; Dunn AG; Eyles JP; Feng HJ; Fortin M; Franettovich Smith MM; Galloway G; Gandomkar Z; Glastras S; Henderson LA; Hides JA; Hiller CE; Hilmer SN; Hoggarth MA; Kim B; Lal N; LaPorta L; Magnussen JS; Maloney S; March L; Nackley AG; O' Leary SP; Peolsson A; Perraton Z; Pool-Goudzwaard AL; Schnitzler M; Seitz AL; Semciw AI; Sheard PW; Smith AC; Snodgrass SJ; Sullivan J; Tran V; Valentin S; Walton DM; Wishart LR; Elliott JM; | 39590726 HKAP |
| 8 | A protocol for trustworthy EEG decoding with neural networks | Borra D; Magosso E; Ravanelli M; | 39549492 ENCS |
| 9 | Near-optimal learning of Banach-valued, high-dimensional functions via deep neural networks | Adcock B; Brugiapaglia S; Dexter N; Moraga S; | 39454372 MATHSTATS |
| 10 | Deep neural network-based robotic visual servoing for satellite target tracking | Ghiasvand S; Xie WF; Mohebbi A; | 39440297 ENCS |
| 11 | Generalization limits of Graph Neural Networks in identity effects learning | D' Inverno GA; Brugiapaglia S; Ravanelli M; | 39426036 ENCS |
| 12 | The immunomodulatory effect of oral NaHCO3 is mediated by the splenic nerve: multivariate impact revealed by artificial neural networks | Alvarez MR; Alkaissi H; Rieger AM; Esber GR; Acosta ME; Stephenson SI; Maurice AV; Valencia LMR; Roman CA; Alarcon JM; | 38549144 CSBN |
| 13 | Reinforcement learning for automatic quadrilateral mesh generation: A soft actor-critic approach | Pan J; Huang J; Cheng G; Zeng Y; | 36375347 ENCS |
| 14 | Comparative Evaluation of Artificial Neural Networks and Data Analysis in Predicting Liposome Size in a Periodic Disturbance Micromixer | Ocampo I; López RR; Camacho-León S; Nerguizian V; Stiharu I; | 34683215 ENCS |
| 15 | X-Vectors: New Quantitative Biomarkers for Early Parkinson's Disease Detection From Speech | Jeancolas L; Petrovska-Delacrétaz D; Mangone G; Benkelfat BE; Corvol JC; Vidailhet M; Lehéricy S; Benali H; | 33679361 PERFORM |
| Title: | A protocol for trustworthy EEG decoding with neural networks | ||||
| Authors: | Borra D, Magosso E, Ravanelli M | ||||
| Link: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39549492/ | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106847 | ||||
| Publication: | Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society | ||||
| Keywords: | Brain-Computer Interfaces; Convolutional neural networks; Deep learning; Electroencephalography; Hyperparameter search; Single-trial EEG decoding; | ||||
| PMID: | 39549492 | Category: | Date Added: | 2024-11-17 | |
| Dept Affiliation: |
ENCS
1 Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi" (DEI), University of Bologna, Cesena, Forlì-Cesena, Italy. Electronic address: davide.borra2@unibo.it. 2 Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi" (DEI), University of Bologna, Cesena, Forlì-Cesena, Italy. 3 Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Mila - Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. |
||||
Description: |
Deep learning solutions have rapidly emerged for EEG decoding, achieving state-of-the-art performance on a variety of decoding tasks. Despite their high performance, existing solutions do not fully address the challenge posed by the introduction of many hyperparameters, defining data pre-processing, network architecture, network training, and data augmentation. Automatic hyperparameter search is rarely performed and limited to network-related hyperparameters. Moreover, pipelines are highly sensitive to performance fluctuations due to random initialization, hindering their reliability. Here, we design a comprehensive protocol for EEG decoding that explores the hyperparameters characterizing the entire pipeline and that includes multi-seed initialization for providing robust performance estimates. Our protocol is validated on 9 datasets about motor imagery, P300, SSVEP, including 204 participants and 26 recording sessions, and on different deep learning models. We accompany our protocol with extensive experiments on the main aspects influencing it, such as the number of participants used for hyperparameter search, the split into sequential simpler searches (multi-step search), the use of informed vs. non-informed search algorithms, and the number of random seeds for obtaining stable performance. The best protocol included 2-step hyperparameter search via an informed search algorithm, with the final training and evaluation performed using 10 random initializations. The optimal trade-off between performance and computational time was achieved by using a subset of 3-5 participants for hyperparameter search. Our protocol consistently outperformed baseline state-of-the-art pipelines, widely across datasets and models, and could represent a standard approach for neuroscientists for decoding EEG in a trustworthy and reliable way. |



