Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"diagnostic" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Wearable biosensors: A comprehensive overview Wu KY; Su ME; Kim Y; Nguyen L; Marchand M; Tran SD; 40683741
ENCS
2 All-Inclusive Sensing Tablet with Integrated Passive Mixer for Ultraviscous Solutions Safiabadi Tali SH; Al-Kassawneh M; Mansouri M; Sadiq Z; Jahanshahi-Anbuhi S; 40327804
ENCS
3 Self-Ambivalence Is Indirectly Associated With Obsessive-Compulsive and Eating Disorder Symptoms Through Different Feared Self-Themes Wilson S; Mesli N; Mehak A; Racine SE; 40227164
PSYCHOLOGY
4 Imaging flow cytometry-based cellular screening elucidates pathophysiology in individuals with Variants of Uncertain Significance Muffels IJJ; Waterham HR; D' Alessandro G; Zagnoli-Vieira G; Sacher M; Lefeber DJ; Van der Vinne C; Roifman CM; Gassen KLI; Rehmann H; Van Haaften-Visser DY; Nieuwenhuis ESS; Jackson SP; Fuchs SA; Wijk F; van Hasselt P; 39920830
BIOLOGY
5 Update and validation of the Beliefs about Losing Control Inventory-II (BALCI-II): a psychometric investigation Kelly-Turner K; Radomsky AS; 39373713
PSYCHOLOGY
6 Are MEDLINE searches sufficient for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools? A review of meta-analyses Rice DB; Kloda LA; Levis B; Qi B; Kingsland E; Thombs BD; 27411746
LIBRARY
7 Reporting quality in abstracts of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: a review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses Rice DB; Kloda LA; Shrier I; Thombs BD; 27864250
LIBRARY
8 At the mercy of myself: A thematic analysis of beliefs about losing control Kelly-Turner K; Radomsky AS; 38131416
PSYCHOLOGY
9 Transparency and completeness of reporting of depression screening tool accuracy studies: A meta-research review of adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies statement Nassar EL; Levis B; Neyer MA; Rice DB; Booij L; Benedetti A; Thombs BD; 36047034
PSYCHOLOGY
10 Sample size and precision of estimates in studies of depression screening tool accuracy: A meta-research review of studies published in 2018-2021 Nassar EL; Levis B; Neyer MA; Rice DB; Booij L; Benedetti A; Thombs BD; 35362161
PSYCHOLOGY
11 Inclusion of currently diagnosed or treated individuals in studies of depression screening tool accuracy: a meta-research review of studies published in 2018-2021 Nassar EL; Levis B; Rice DB; Booij L; Benedetti A; Thombs BD; 35334411
PSYCHOLOGY
12 Should Burnout Be Conceptualized as a Mental Disorder? Nadon L; De Beer LT; Morin AJS; 35323401
PSYCHOLOGY
13 Probability of Major Depression Classification Based on the SCID, CIDI, and MINI Diagnostic Interviews: A Synthesis of Three Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses Wu Y; Levis B; Ioannidis JPA; Benedetti A; Thombs BD; 32814337
LIBRARY
14 Probability of major depression diagnostic classification based on the SCID, CIDI and MINI diagnostic interviews controlling for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression subscale scores: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 73 primary studies Wu Y; Levis B; Sun Y; Krishnan A; He C; Riehm KE; Rice DB; Azar M; Yan XW; Neupane D; Bhandari PM; Imran M; Chiovitti MJ; Saadat N; Boruff JT; Cuijpers P; Gilbody S; McMillan D; Ioannidis JPA; Kloda LA; Patten SB; Shrier I; Ziegelstein RC; Henry M; Ismail Z; Loiselle CG; Mitchell ND; Tonelli M; Al-Adawi S; Beraldi A; Braeken APBM; Büel-Drabe N; Bunevicius A; Carter G; Chen CK; Cheung G; Clover K; Conroy RM; Cukor D; da Rocha E Silva CE; Dabscheck E; Daray FM; Douven E; Downing MG; Feinstein A; Ferentinos PP; Fischer FH; Flint AJ; Fujimori M; Gallagher P; Gandy M; Goebel S; Grassi L; Härter M; Jenewein J; Jetté N; Julião M; Kim JM; Kim SW; Kjærgaard M; Köhler S; Loosman WL; Löwe B; Martin-Santos R; Massardo L; Matsuoka Y; Mehnert A; Michopoulos I; Misery L; Navines R; O' Donnell ML; Öztürk A; Peceliuniene J; Pintor L; Ponsford JL; Quinn TJ; Reme SE; Reuter K; Rooney AG; Sánchez-González R; Schwarzbold ML; Senturk Cankorur V; Shaaban J; Sharpe L; Sharpe M; Simard S; Singer S; Stafford L; Stone J; Sultan S; Teixeira AL; Tiringer I; Turner A; Walker J; Walterfang M; Wang LJ; White J; Wong DK; Benedetti A; Thombs BD; 31911325
LIBRARY
15 Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis Levis B; McMillan D; Sun Y; He C; Rice DB; Krishnan A; Wu Y; Azar M; Sanchez TA; Chiovitti MJ; Bhandari PM; Neupane D; Saadat N; Riehm KE; Imran M; Boruff JT; Cuijpers P; Gilbody S; Ioannidis JPA; Kloda LA; Patten SB; Shrier I; Ziegelstein RC; Comeau L; Mitchell ND; Tonelli M; Vigod SN; Aceti F; Alvarado R; Alvarado-Esquivel C; Bakare MO; Barnes J; Beck CT; Bindt C; Boyce PM; Bunevicius A; Couto TCE; Chaudron LH; Correa H; de Figueiredo FP; Eapen V; Fernandes M; Figueiredo B; Fisher JRW; Garcia-Esteve L; Giardinelli L; Helle N; Howard LM; Khalifa DS; Kohlhoff J; Kusminskas L; Kozinszky Z; Lelli L; Leonardou AA; Lewis BA; Maes M; Meuti V; Nakic Radoš S; Navarro García P; Nishi D; Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono D; Robertson-Blackmore E; Rochat TJ; Rowe HJ; Siu BWM; Skalkidou A; Stein A; Stewart RC; Su KP; Sundström-Poromaa I; Tadinac M; Tandon SD; Tendais I; Thiagayson P; Töreki A; Torres-Giménez A; Tran TD; Trevillion K; Turner K; Vega-Dienstmaier JM; Wynter K; Yonkers KA; Benedetti A; Thombs BD; 31568624
LIBRARY
16 Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis Wu Y; Levis B; Riehm KE; Saadat N; Levis AW; Azar M; Rice DB; Boruff J; Cuijpers P; Gilbody S; Ioannidis JPA; Kloda LA; McMillan D; Patten SB; Shrier I; Ziegelstein RC; Akena DH; Arroll B; Ayalon L; Baradaran HR; Baron M; Bombardier CH; Butterworth P; Carter G; Chagas MH; Chan JCN; Cholera R; Conwell Y; de Man-van Ginkel JM; Fann JR; Fischer FH; Fung D; Gelaye B; Goodyear-Smith F; Greeno CG; Hall BJ; Harrison PA; Härter M; Hegerl U; Hides L; Hobfoll SE; Hudson M; Hyphantis T; Inagaki M; Jetté N; Khamseh ME; Kiely KM; Kwan Y; Lamers F; Liu SI; Lotrakul M; Loureiro SR; Löwe B; McGuire A; Mohd-Sidik S; Munhoz TN; Muramatsu K; Osório FL; Patel V; Pence BW; Persoons P; Picardi A; Reuter K; Rooney AG; Santos IS; Shaaban J; Sidebottom A; Simning A; Stafford L; Sung S; Tan PLL; Turner A; van Weert HC; White J; Whooley MA; Winkley K; Yamada M; Benedetti A; Thombs BD; 31298180
LIBRARY
17 Diagnostic accuracy of the Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) for detecting major depression: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses. Thombs BD, Benedetti A, Kloda LA, Levis B, Azar M, Riehm KE, Saadat N, Cuijpers P, Gilbody S, Ioannidis JP, McMillan D, Patten SB, Shrier I, Steele RJ, Ziegelstein RC, Loiselle CG, Henry M, Ismail Z, Mitchell N, Tonelli M 27075844
LIBRARY

 

Title:Probability of Major Depression Classification Based on the SCID, CIDI, and MINI Diagnostic Interviews: A Synthesis of Three Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses
Authors:Wu YLevis BIoannidis JPABenedetti AThombs BD
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32814337/
DOI:10.1159/000509283
Publication:Psychotherapy and psychosomatics
Keywords:ClassificationDepressive disordersDiagnostic interviewsIndividual participant data meta-analysisMajor depression
PMID:32814337 Category: Date Added:2020-10-20
Dept Affiliation: LIBRARY
1 Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
2 Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
3 Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
4 Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.
5 Departments of Medicine, Health Research and Policy, Biomedical Data Science, and Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
6 Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
7 Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
8 Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada, brett.thombs@mcgill.ca.
9 Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada, brett.thombs@mcgill.ca.
10 Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada, brett.thombs@mcgill.ca.
11 Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada, brett.thombs@mcgill.ca.
12 Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada, brett.thombs@mcgill.ca.
13 Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada, brett.thombs@mcgill.ca.
14 Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada, brett.thombs@mcgill.ca.
15 Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
16 Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
17 Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
18 Hull York Medical School and the Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.
19 Library, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
20 Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
21 Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
22 International Union for Health Promotion and Health Education, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
23 Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
24 Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
25 Women's College Hospital and Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
26 Hotchkiss Brain Institute and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
27 Department of Psychiatry, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
28 Department of Behavioural Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
29 King Abdulaziz University, Abdullah Sulayman, Jeddah, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
30 School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
31 Laboratorio de Investigación Biomédica, Facultad de Medicina y Nutrición, Avenida Universidad, Dgo, Mexico.
32 Department of Rehabilitation Med

Description:

Introduction: Three previous individual participant data meta-analyses (IPDMAs) reported that, compared to the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM (SCID), alternative reference standards, primarily the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), tended to misclassify major depression status, when controlling for depression symptom severity. However, there was an important lack of precision in the results.

Objective: To compare the odds of the major depression classification based on the SCID, CIDI, and MINI.

Methods: We included and standardized data from 3 IPDMA databases. For each IPDMA, separately, we fitted binomial generalized linear mixed models to compare the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of major depression classification, controlling for symptom severity and characteristics of participants, and the interaction between interview and symptom severity. Next, we synthesized results using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis.

Results: In total, 69,405 participants (7,574 [11%] with major depression) from 212 studies were included. Controlling for symptom severity and participant characteristics, the MINI (74 studies; 25,749 participants) classified major depression more often than the SCID (108 studies; 21,953 participants; aOR 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.92]). Classification odds for the CIDI (30 studies; 21,703 participants) and the SCID did not differ overall (aOR 1.19; 95% CI 0.79-1.75); however, as screening scores increased, the aOR increased less for the CIDI than the SCID (interaction aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.52-0.80).

Conclusions: Compared to the SCID, the MINI classified major depression more often. The odds of the depression classification with the CIDI increased less as symptom levels increased. Interpretation of research that uses diagnostic interviews to classify depression should consider the interview characteristics.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University