Keyword search (4,164 papers available)

"degenerative cervical myelopathy" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 The effect of postoperative rehabilitation on outcomes in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM): A systematic review Montpetit C; Kobaisi A; Lantz JM; Chauhan RV; Anderson DB; Fortin M; 41693706
SOH
2 What is the role of non-surgical clinicians in the assessment and management of degenerative cervical myelopathy? - Insights from the RECODE-DCM peri-operative rehabilitation incubator Chauhan RV; Demetriades AK; Boerger TF; Lantz JM; Treanor C; Kalsi-Ryan S; Kumar V; Wood L; Plener J; Wilson N; Fortin M; Ammendolia C; Paus A; Dhillon RS; Davies B; Fehlings MG; Anderson DB; 40487873
SOH
3 Morphological Changes of Deep Extensor Neck Muscles in Relation to the Maximum Level of Cord Compression and Canal Compromise in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Naghdi N; Elliott JM; Weber MH; Fehlings MG; Fortin M; 36289049
PERFORM
4 Cervical muscle morphometry and composition demonstrate prognostic value in degenerative cervical myelopathy outcomes Naghdi N; Elliott JM; Weber MH; Fehlings MG; Fortin M; 37745653
PERFORM
5 Relationship between cervical muscle morphology evaluated by MRI, cervical muscle strength and functional outcomes in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Fortin M, Wilk N, Dobrescu O, Martel P, Santaguida C, Weber MH 30059855
PERFORM

 

Title:The effect of postoperative rehabilitation on outcomes in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM): A systematic review
Authors:Montpetit CKobaisi ALantz JMChauhan RVAnderson DBFortin M
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41693706/
DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2026.105956
Publication:Brain & spine
Keywords:Degenerative cervical myelopathyPostoperativeRehabilitationSystematic review
PMID:41693706 Category: Date Added:2026-02-16
Dept Affiliation: SOH
1 Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
2 School of Health, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
3 Centre de réadaptation Constance-Lethbridge du CIUSS COMTL, Montreal, QC, Canada.
4 USC Spine Physical Therapy Fellowship Program, Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
5 Department of Orthopaedic Physiotherapy, Auckland Spine Surgery Centre, Auckland, New Zealand.
6 Active Living and Rehabilitation: Aotearoa New Zealand, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
7 School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Description:

Introduction: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the leading cause of adult spinal cord dysfunction, often requiring surgery. However, the role of postoperative rehabilitation in optimizing patient outcomes remains unclear.

Research question: What are the effects of postoperative rehabilitation on clinical outcomes following DCM surgery?

Material and methods: This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024582484). PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through September 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and other research on rehabilitation interventions for postoperative outcomes (e.g., function, pain, neurological recovery) in patients undergoing DCM surgery. Studies without confirmed DCM, non-peer-reviewed articles, or lacking a rehabilitation protocol were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. Descriptive summaries were conducted, categorizing studies into active, passive, and mixed interventions. The evidence quality was rated using the GRADE approach.

Results: Ten studies with a total of 766 patients were included, made up of 5 RCTs and 5 cohort studies. Seven studies had high risk of bias, and three had moderate risk of bias. Mixed rehabilitation interventions combining physical, behavioral, and psychosocial strategies yielded the most consistent improvements in neurological function, quality of life, and self-efficacy. Intervention timing ranged from a few days postoperatively to 6 months. A meta-analysis was not performed due to study heterogeneity.

Discussion and conclusion: Postoperative rehabilitation for DCM shows promise, particularly with multimodal, goal-oriented, and patient-centered approaches. However, evidence is limited by the high risk of bias, poor methodological detail and lack of standardization.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University