Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"compulsive disorder" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 The prevalence and predictors of aggressive obsessions in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analytic review Fawcett EJ; Morris Q; Lahey C; Corran C; Krause S; Bishop OC; Rash JA; Carter J; Fawcett JM; 41650656
PSYCHOLOGY
2 Self-Ambivalence Is Indirectly Associated With Obsessive-Compulsive and Eating Disorder Symptoms Through Different Feared Self-Themes Wilson S; Mesli N; Mehak A; Racine SE; 40227164
PSYCHOLOGY
3 Putting things right: An experimental investigation of memory biases related to symmetry, ordering and arranging behaviour Radomsky AS; Ouellet-Courtois C; Golden E; Senn JM; Parrish CL; 37793286
PSYCHOLOGY
4 COVID-19 related stress and fears of contamination: the impact of feared self-perceptions Audet JS; Jacmin-Park S; Kheloui S; Gravel C; Juster RP; Aardema F; 37359678
PSYCHOLOGY
5 An Experimental Investigation of Moral Self-Violation and Mental Contamination Krause S; Radomsky AS; 37363745
PSYCHOLOGY
6 Can immorality be contracted? Appraisals of moral disgust and contamination fear Ouellet-Courtois C; Radomsky AS; 37270955
PSYCHOLOGY
7 Development and validation of the multidimensional version of the Fear of Self Questionnaire: Corrupted, culpable and malformed feared possible selves in obsessive-compulsive and body-dysmorphic symptoms. Aardema F, Radomsky AS, Moulding R, Wong SF, Bourguignon L, Giraldo-O'Meara M 33547834
PSYCHOLOGY
8 The Covert and Overt Reassurance Seeking Inventory (CORSI): Development, validation and psychometric analyses. Radomsky AS, Neal RL, Parrish CL, Lavoie SL, Schell SE 33046164
CONCORDIA
9 Hoping for more: How cognitive science has and hasn't been helpful to the OCD clinician. Ouimet AJ, Ashbaugh AR, Radomsky AS 29673581
PSYCHOLOGY
10 Manipulating visual perspective for obsessional imagery and its impact on obsessive-compulsive symptoms in an analogue sample. Wong SF, Hu DAP, Grisham JR 32361667
PSYCHOLOGY
11 Cognitive therapy for compulsive checking in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A pilot trial. Radomsky AS, Giraldo-O'Meara M, Wong SF, Dugas MJ, Gelfand LA, Rachman S, Schell S, Senn JM, Shafran R, Whittal ML 32070838
PSYCHOLOGY
12 What do you really need? Self- and partner-reported intervention preferences within cognitive behavioural therapy for reassurance seeking behaviour. Neal RL, Radomsky AS 31495351
PSYCHOLOGY

 

Title:What do you really need? Self- and partner-reported intervention preferences within cognitive behavioural therapy for reassurance seeking behaviour.
Authors:Neal RLRadomsky AS
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31495351?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.1017/S135246581900050X
Publication:Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy
Keywords:acceptabilitycognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)intervention preferenceobsessive compulsive disorder (OCD)partnersreassurance seeking
PMID:31495351 Category:Behav Cogn Psychother Date Added:2019-09-10
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, Canada.

Description:

What do you really need? Self- and partner-reported intervention preferences within cognitive behavioural therapy for reassurance seeking behaviour.

Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Sep 09;:1-13

Authors: Neal RL, Radomsky AS

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reassurance seeking (RS) in obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is commonly addressed in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) using a technique called reducing accommodation. Reducing accommodation is a behaviourally based CBT intervention that may be effective; however, there is a lack of controlled research on its use and acceptability to clients/patients, and case studies suggest that it can be associated with negative emotional/behavioural consequences. Providing support to encourage coping with distress is a cognitively based CBT intervention that may be an effective alternative, but lacks evidence regarding its acceptability.

AIMS: This study aimed to determine whether support provision may be a more acceptable/endorsed CBT intervention for RS than a strict reducing accommodation approach.

METHOD: Participants and familiar partners (N = 179) read vignette descriptions of accommodation reduction and support interventions, and responded to measures of perceived intervention acceptability/adhereability and endorsement, before completing a forced-choice preference task.

RESULTS: Overall, findings suggested that participants and partners gave significantly higher ratings for the support than the accommodation reduction intervention (partial ?2 = .049 to .321). Participants and partners also both selected the support intervention more often than the traditional reducing accommodation intervention when given the choice.

CONCLUSIONS: Support provision is perceived as an acceptable CBT intervention for RS by participants and their familiar partners. These results have implications for cognitive behavioural theory and practice related to RS.

PMID: 31495351 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University