Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"activity recognition" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 In Shift and In Variance: Assessing the Robustness of HAR Deep Learning Models Against Variability Khaked AA; Oishi N; Roggen D; Lago P; 39860799
ENCS
2 Human Activity Recognition with an HMM-Based Generative Model Manouchehri N; Bouguila N; 36772428
ENCS
3 Human Activity Recognition: A Comparative Study to Assess the Contribution Level of Accelerometer, ECG, and PPG Signals Afzali Arani MS; Costa DE; Shihab E; 34770303
ENCS
4 On the Impact of Biceps Muscle Fatigue in Human Activity Recognition. Elshafei M, Costa DE, Shihab E 33557239
ENCS
5 Towards Detecting Biceps Muscle Fatigue in Gym Activity Using Wearables. Elshafei M, Shihab E 33498702
ENCS
6 A Benchmark of Data Stream Classification for Human Activity Recognition on Connected Objects. Khannouz M; Glatard T; 33202905
ENCS
7 A Quantitative Comparison of Overlapping and Non-Overlapping Sliding Windows for Human Activity Recognition Using Inertial Sensors. Dehghani A, Sarbishei O, Glatard T, Shihab E 31752158
ENCS

 

Title:In Shift and In Variance: Assessing the Robustness of HAR Deep Learning Models Against Variability
Authors:Khaked AAOishi NRoggen DLago P
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39860799/
DOI:10.3390/s25020430
Publication:Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
Keywords:data heterogeneitydeep learningdistribution shifthuman activity recognitionmodel robustness evaluationreal world variabilitywearable sensors
PMID:39860799 Category: Date Added:2025-01-25
Dept Affiliation: ENCS
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada.
2 School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9PS, UK.

Description:

Deep learning (DL)-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR) using wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors can revolutionize continuous health monitoring and early disease prediction. However, most DL HAR models are untested in their robustness to real-world variability, as they are trained on limited lab-controlled data. In this study, we isolated and analyzed the effects of the subject, device, position, and orientation variabilities on DL HAR models using the HARVAR and REALDISP datasets. The Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) was used to quantify shifts in the data distribution caused by these variabilities, and the relationship between the distribution shifts and model performance was drawn. Our HARVAR results show that different types of variability significantly degraded the DL model performance, with an inverse relationship between the data distribution shifts and performance. The compounding effect of multiple variabilities studied using REALDISP further underscores the challenges of generalizing DL HAR models to real-world conditions. Analyzing these impacts highlights the need for more robust models that generalize effectively to real-world settings. The MMD proved valuable for explaining the performance drops, emphasizing its utility in evaluating distribution shifts in HAR data.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University