Keyword search (4,164 papers available)

"Sustainable development goals" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Resource efficiency analysis through planetary boundary-based life cycle assessment: a case study of sugarcane in Pakistan Ghani HU; Ryberg M; Bjørn A; Hauschild MZ; Gheewala SH; 37363084
ENCS
2 Green building standards and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals Goubran S; Walker T; Cucuzzella C; Schwartz T; 36372039
ENCS

 

Title:Green building standards and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals
Authors:Goubran SWalker TCucuzzella CSchwartz T
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36372039/
DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116552
Publication:Journal of environmental management
Keywords:2030 AgendaBuilding standardsReal estateSustainable developmentSustainable development goalsTransformative change
PMID:36372039 Category: Date Added:2022-11-14
Dept Affiliation: ENCS
1 Department of Architecture, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo (AUC), Egypt.
2 Department of Finance, John Molson School of Business, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada; Director of the L. Jacques Ménard BMO Centre for Capital Markets and Concordia University Research Chair (Tier 1) in Emerging Risk Management, Canada. Electronic address: thomas.walker@concordia.ca.
3 Department of Design and Computation Arts, Faculty of Fine Arts, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada; Concordia University Research Chair (Tier 2) in Integrated Design, Ecology, and Sustainability for the Built Environment (IDEAS-Be), Canada.
4 Data Science, and Business Analytics Program, HEC Montreal, Montreal, Canada.

Description:

Sustainable practices in the building industry are strongly influenced by published green and sustainable building and real-estate standards (GSBRES). Therefore, it is crucial to assess how these standards contribute to achieving the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This paper evaluates the extent to which GSBRESs align with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, lending a particular focus to the call for transformative change implicit in the SDGs. To this end, we develop a methodology that combines qualitative and quantitative analysis to assess the overlap between the content of three GSBRESs (LEED for design, BOMA BEST for operation, and GRESB for investment) and the SDGs. Despite the overlaps between the attributes of the GSBRESs and the general topics of the SDGs, we find that less than 20% of GSBRES attributes address the specific targets of the 2030 Agenda. Most importantly, the qualitative analysis shows that less than 10% of the standards' scores is attributed to transformative change. We conclude that claims that the GSBRESs are effective in advancing the SDGs are overstated and, without further empirical evidence, caution that they increase the risk of sustainable development greenwashing. We recommend that the standards be repositioned to adopt transformation-focused indicators related to a project's long-term impacts.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University