Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Safety" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Impact of COVID-19 on incidence and trends of adverse events among hospitalised patients in Calgary, Canada: a retrospective chart review study Wu G; Eastwood CA; Cheligeer C; Southern DA; Zeng Y; Ghali WA; Bakal JA; Boussat B; Flemons W; Forster A; Xu Y; Quan H; 41592994
CONCORDIA
2 Leading the way to a safer workplace: What enables supervisors to be servant leaders and enhance subordinates workplace safety behaviors? Chen YP; Hsu YS; Panaccio A; Wang H; 40483067
JMSB
3 The false promise of return to work for migrant workers injured on the job in Canada: When public policies intersect to create exclusion Hanley J; Ventura Sanchez G; Goswami P; Mayell S; McLaughlin J; Hennebry J; 40223307
SOCANTH
4 Effect of age on hypnotics' efficacy and safety in insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis Patrick Viet-Quoc N; Thien Thanh DV; Philippe L; Sebastien C; Lidia S; Philippe D; 39603114
CONCORDIA
5 Feeling safe: a critical look at the effect of neighborhood safety features and perceptions on childhood symptoms of depression Infantino E; Barnett TA; Côté-Lussier C; Van Hulst A; Henderson M; Mathieu ME; Sabiston C; Kakinami L; 39604905
SOH
6 Supporting pregnant and parenting women who use alcohol during pregnancy: A scoping review of trauma-informed approaches Morton Ninomiya ME; Almomani Y; Dunbar Winsor K; Burns N; Harding KD; Ropson M; Chaves D; Wolfson L; 36744547
CONCORDIA
7 Microfluidics in smart packaging of foods Pou KRJ; Raghavan V; Packirisamy M; 36192908
ENCS
8 Survey of Cooperative Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: From a Holistic and Systemic Vision González-Saavedra JF; Figueroa M; Céspedes S; Montejo-Sánchez S; 35459025
ENCS
9 Measuring workplace psychosocial factors in the federal government Blais AR; Michaud I; Simard JF; Mach L; Houle S; 35044739
CONCORDIA

 

Title:Measuring workplace psychosocial factors in the federal government
Authors:Blais ARMichaud ISimard JFMach LHoule S
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35044739/
DOI:10.25318/82-003-x202101200001-eng
Publication:Health reports
Keywords:National Standard of Canada for Psychological Health and Safety in the WorkplacePublic Service Employee Surveyjob satisfactionpsychological health and safetypsychosocial factorspublic service employees
PMID:35044739 Category: Date Added:2022-01-19
Dept Affiliation: CONCORDIA
1 Human Resources Planning and Business Transformation Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.
2 International Cooperation and Methodology Innovation Centre, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.
3 Statistical Integration Methods Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.
4 Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec.

Description:

Background: The National Standard of Canada for Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace (the Standard) identifies 13 psychosocial factors affecting psychological health and safety in the workplace that employers should measure and monitor with the goal of addressing areas for improvement. The present study sought to determine the suitability of the Public Service Employee Survey as a tool for the assessment of these psychosocial factors in public service employees. It also aimed to explore-in a preliminary manner-predictors of job satisfaction in these employees.

Data and methods: Data from the 2017 and 2019 Public Service Employee Survey (PSES) were analyzed. Specifically, exploratory structural modelling and tests of measurement invariance were used to identify a measurement model reflecting the psychosocial factors outlined in the Standard and to evaluate the equivalence of this model across both PSES administrations.

Results: The analyses uncovered 10 of the 13 psychosocial factors, as well as 2 closely related factors-diversity and inclusion-and supported the full invariance of the resulting measurement model across both PSES administrations. Lastly, preliminary results pointed to recognition and reward (encompassing leader reward behaviours) and involvement and influence (touching on participative decision making, innovation and initiative) as predictors of job satisfaction in both samples of public service employees.

Interpretation: The present study identified the PSES as a tool for the assessment-in public service employees-of the majority of the psychosocial factors outlined in the Standard as well as two additional factors of particular importance to the federal government, diversity and inclusion. Future research to address current limitations is discussed, as are preliminary implications for practice.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University