| Keyword search (4,163 papers available) | ![]() |
"Reinforcement learning" Keyword-tagged Publications:
| Title | Authors | PubMed ID | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Disentangling prediction error and value in a formal test of dopamine s role in reinforcement learning | Usypchuk AA; Maes EJP; Lozzi M; Avramidis DK; Schoenbaum G; Esber GR; Gardner MPH; Iordanova MD; | 40738112 CSBN |
| 2 | Comprehensive review of reinforcement learning for medical ultrasound imaging | Elmekki H; Islam S; Alagha A; Sami H; Spilkin A; Zakeri E; Zanuttini AM; Bentahar J; Kadem L; Xie WF; Pibarot P; Mizouni R; Otrok H; Singh S; Mourad A; | 40567264 ENCS |
| 3 | Machine learning innovations in CPR: a comprehensive survey on enhanced resuscitation techniques | Islam S; Rjoub G; Elmekki H; Bentahar J; Pedrycz W; Cohen R; | 40336660 ENCS |
| 4 | Computational neuroscience across the lifespan: Promises and pitfalls | van den Bos W; Bruckner R; Nassar MR; Mata R; Eppinger B; | 29066078 PSYCHOLOGY |
| 5 | Does phasic dopamine release cause policy updates? | Carter F; Cossette MP; Trujillo-Pisanty I; Pallikaras V; Breton YA; Conover K; Caplan J; Solis P; Voisard J; Yaksich A; Shizgal P; | 38039083 PSYCHOLOGY |
| 6 | Nonlinear dynamic modeling and model-based AI-driven control of a magnetoactive soft continuum robot in a fluidic environment | Moezi SA; Sedaghati R; Rakheja S; | 37932207 ENCS |
| 7 | Sub-hourly measurement datasets from 6 real buildings: Energy use and indoor climate | Sartori I; Walnum HT; Skeie KS; Georges L; Knudsen MD; Bacher P; Candanedo J; Sigounis AM; Prakash AK; Pritoni M; Granderson J; Yang S; Wan MP; | 37153123 ENCS |
| 8 | Reinforcement learning for automatic quadrilateral mesh generation: A soft actor-critic approach | Pan J; Huang J; Cheng G; Zeng Y; | 36375347 ENCS |
| 9 | Trust-Augmented Deep Reinforcement Learning for Federated Learning Client Selection | Rjoub G; Wahab OA; Bentahar J; Cohen R; Bataineh AS; | 35875592 ENCS |
| 10 | Designing a hybrid reinforcement learning based algorithm with application in prediction of the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec. | Khalilpourazari S, Hashemi Doulabi H | 33424076 ENCS |
| 11 | Cue-Evoked Dopamine Neuron Activity Helps Maintain but Does Not Encode Expected Value. | Mendoza JA, Lafferty CK, Yang AK, Britt JP | 31693885 CSBN |
| 12 | Metacontrol of decision-making strategies in human aging. | Bolenz F, Kool W, Reiter AM, Eppinger B | 31397670 PERFORM |
| 13 | Developmental Changes in Learning: Computational Mechanisms and Social Influences. | Bolenz F, Reiter AMF, Eppinger B | 29250006 PERFORM |
| Title: | Computational neuroscience across the lifespan: Promises and pitfalls | ||||
| Authors: | van den Bos W, Bruckner R, Nassar MR, Mata R, Eppinger B | ||||
| Link: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29066078/ | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.09.008 | ||||
| Publication: | Developmental cognitive neuroscience | ||||
| Keywords: | Brain development; Computational neuroscience; Decision-making; Identification; Reinforcement learning; Risk-taking; Strategies; | ||||
| PMID: | 29066078 | Category: | Date Added: | 2017-10-26 | |
| Dept Affiliation: |
PSYCHOLOGY
1 Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany; Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; International Max Planck Research School LIFE, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: vandenbos@mpib-berlin.mpg.de. 2 Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; International Max Planck Research School LIFE, Berlin, Germany. 3 Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, USA. 4 Center for Cognitive and Decision Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 5 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Psychology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Electronic address: ben.eppinger@concordia.ca. |
||||
Description: |
In recent years, the application of computational modeling in studies on age-related changes in decision making and learning has gained in popularity. One advantage of computational models is that they provide access to latent variables that cannot be directly observed from behavior. In combination with experimental manipulations, these latent variables can help to test hypotheses about age-related changes in behavioral and neurobiological measures at a level of specificity that is not achievable with descriptive analysis approaches alone. This level of specificity can in turn be beneficial to establish the identity of the corresponding behavioral and neurobiological mechanisms. In this paper, we will illustrate applications of computational methods using examples of lifespan research on risk taking, strategy selection and reinforcement learning. We will elaborate on problems that can occur when computational neuroscience methods are applied to data of different age groups. Finally, we will discuss potential targets for future applications and outline general shortcomings of computational neuroscience methods for research on human lifespan development. |



