Keyword search (4,164 papers available)

"Reinforcement" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Disentangling prediction error and value in a formal test of dopamine s role in reinforcement learning Usypchuk AA; Maes EJP; Lozzi M; Avramidis DK; Schoenbaum G; Esber GR; Gardner MPH; Iordanova MD; 40738112
CSBN
2 Comprehensive review of reinforcement learning for medical ultrasound imaging Elmekki H; Islam S; Alagha A; Sami H; Spilkin A; Zakeri E; Zanuttini AM; Bentahar J; Kadem L; Xie WF; Pibarot P; Mizouni R; Otrok H; Singh S; Mourad A; 40567264
ENCS
3 Activating Group II Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors in the Basolateral Amygdala Inhibits Increases in Reward Seeking Triggered by Discriminative Stimuli in Rats LeCocq MR; Mainville-Berthiaume A; Laplante I; Samaha AN; 40341317
CSBN
4 Machine learning innovations in CPR: a comprehensive survey on enhanced resuscitation techniques Islam S; Rjoub G; Elmekki H; Bentahar J; Pedrycz W; Cohen R; 40336660
ENCS
5 Computational neuroscience across the lifespan: Promises and pitfalls van den Bos W; Bruckner R; Nassar MR; Mata R; Eppinger B; 29066078
PSYCHOLOGY
6 Relapse after intermittent access to cocaine: Discriminative cues more effectively trigger drug seeking than do conditioned cues Ndiaye NA; Shamleh SA; Casale D; Castaneda-Ouellet S; Laplante I; Robinson MJF; Samaha AN; 38767684
PSYCHOLOGY
7 Post-reinforcement pauses during slot machine gambling are moderated by immersion W Spencer Murch 38429228
PSYCHOLOGY
8 Does phasic dopamine release cause policy updates? Carter F; Cossette MP; Trujillo-Pisanty I; Pallikaras V; Breton YA; Conover K; Caplan J; Solis P; Voisard J; Yaksich A; Shizgal P; 38039083
PSYCHOLOGY
9 Nonlinear dynamic modeling and model-based AI-driven control of a magnetoactive soft continuum robot in a fluidic environment Moezi SA; Sedaghati R; Rakheja S; 37932207
ENCS
10 Sub-hourly measurement datasets from 6 real buildings: Energy use and indoor climate Sartori I; Walnum HT; Skeie KS; Georges L; Knudsen MD; Bacher P; Candanedo J; Sigounis AM; Prakash AK; Pritoni M; Granderson J; Yang S; Wan MP; 37153123
ENCS
11 Reinforcement learning for automatic quadrilateral mesh generation: A soft actor-critic approach Pan J; Huang J; Cheng G; Zeng Y; 36375347
ENCS
12 Trust-Augmented Deep Reinforcement Learning for Federated Learning Client Selection Rjoub G; Wahab OA; Bentahar J; Cohen R; Bataineh AS; 35875592
ENCS
13 Neural evidence for age-related deficits in the representation of state spaces Ruel A; Bolenz F; Li SC; Fischer A; Eppinger B; 35510942
PERFORM
14 Designing a hybrid reinforcement learning based algorithm with application in prediction of the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec. Khalilpourazari S, Hashemi Doulabi H 33424076
ENCS
15 Cue-Evoked Dopamine Neuron Activity Helps Maintain but Does Not Encode Expected Value. Mendoza JA, Lafferty CK, Yang AK, Britt JP 31693885
CSBN
16 Metacontrol of decision-making strategies in human aging. Bolenz F, Kool W, Reiter AM, Eppinger B 31397670
PERFORM
17 Effects of contingent and noncontingent nicotine on lever pressing for liquids and consumption in water-deprived rats. Frenk H, Martin J, Vitouchanskaia C, Dar R, Shalev U 27889434
CSBN
18 Developmental Changes in Learning: Computational Mechanisms and Social Influences. Bolenz F, Reiter AMF, Eppinger B 29250006
PERFORM

 

Title:Computational neuroscience across the lifespan: Promises and pitfalls
Authors:van den Bos WBruckner RNassar MRMata REppinger B
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29066078/
DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.09.008
Publication:Developmental cognitive neuroscience
Keywords:Brain developmentComputational neuroscienceDecision-makingIdentificationReinforcement learningRisk-takingStrategies
PMID:29066078 Category: Date Added:2017-10-26
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany; Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; International Max Planck Research School LIFE, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: vandenbos@mpib-berlin.mpg.de.
2 Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; International Max Planck Research School LIFE, Berlin, Germany.
3 Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, USA.
4 Center for Cognitive and Decision Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
5 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Psychology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Electronic address: ben.eppinger@concordia.ca.

Description:

In recent years, the application of computational modeling in studies on age-related changes in decision making and learning has gained in popularity. One advantage of computational models is that they provide access to latent variables that cannot be directly observed from behavior. In combination with experimental manipulations, these latent variables can help to test hypotheses about age-related changes in behavioral and neurobiological measures at a level of specificity that is not achievable with descriptive analysis approaches alone. This level of specificity can in turn be beneficial to establish the identity of the corresponding behavioral and neurobiological mechanisms. In this paper, we will illustrate applications of computational methods using examples of lifespan research on risk taking, strategy selection and reinforcement learning. We will elaborate on problems that can occur when computational neuroscience methods are applied to data of different age groups. Finally, we will discuss potential targets for future applications and outline general shortcomings of computational neuroscience methods for research on human lifespan development.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University