Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Paraspinal muscle" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Aquatic exercise versus standard care on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in chronic low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial Rosenstein B; Montpetit C; Vaillancourt N; Dover G; Weiss C; Papula LA; Melek A; Fortin M; 40328824
SOH
2 Comparison of Combined Motor Control Training and Isolated Extensor Strengthening Versus General Exercise on Lumbar Paraspinal Muscle Health and Associations With Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Rosenstein B; Rye M; Roussac A; Naghdi N; Macedo LG; Elliott J; DeMont R; Weber MH; Pepin V; Dover G; Fortin M; 40066720
SOH
3 The assessment of paraspinal muscle epimuscular fat in participants with and without low back pain: A case-control study Rosenstein B; Burdick J; Roussac A; Rye M; Naghdi N; Valentin S; Licka T; Sean M; Tétreault P; Elliott J; Fortin M; 38280825
HKAP
4 Thresholding approaches for estimating paraspinal muscle fat infiltration using T1- and T2-weighted MRI: Comparative analysis using water-fat MRI Ornowski J; Dziesinski L; Hess M; Krug R; Fortin M; Torres-Espin A; Majumdar S; Pedoia V; Bonnheim NB; Bailey JF; 38222819
HKAP
5 Effect of aquatic exercise versus standard care on paraspinal and gluteal muscles morphology in individuals with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial protocol Rosenstein B; Montpetit C; Vaillancourt N; Dover G; Khalini-Mahani N; Weiss C; Papula LA; Melek A; Fortin M; 38110922
SOH
6 The Effects of Combined Motor Control and Isolated Extensor Strengthening versus General Exercise on Paraspinal Muscle Morphology, Composition, and Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Fortin M; Rye M; Roussac A; Montpetit C; Burdick J; Naghdi N; Rosenstein B; Bertrand C; Macedo LG; Elliott JM; Dover G; DeMont R; Weber MH; Pepin V; 37762861
PERFORM
7 Comparison of paraspinal muscle composition measurements using IDEAL fat-water and T2-weighted MR images Sara Masi 36997912
PERFORM
8 Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group Hodges PW; Bailey JF; Fortin M; Battié MC; 34542672
HKAP
9 LUMINOUS database: lumbar multifidus muscle segmentation from ultrasound images Belasso CJ; Behboodi B; Benali H; Boily M; Rivaz H; Fortin M; 33097024
PERFORM
10 Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Characteristics, Body Composition, and Injury in University Rugby Players Lévesque J; Rivaz H; Rizk A; Frenette S; Boily M; Fortin M; 32997748
PERFORM
11 Evaluation of an automated thresholding algorithm for the quantification of paraspinal muscle composition from MRI images. Fortin M, Omidyeganeh M, Battié MC, Ahmad O, Rivaz H 28532491
PERFORM
12 Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of the Cervical Spine Extensor Muscles: Intrarater and Interrater Reliability of a Novice and an Experienced Rater. Fortin M, Dobrescu O, Jarzem P, Ouellet J, Weber MH 29503688
PERFORM
13 Population-averaged MRI atlases for automated image processing and assessments of lumbar paraspinal muscles. Xiao Y, Fortin M, Battié MC, Rivaz H 30051147
PERFORM

 

Title:The assessment of paraspinal muscle epimuscular fat in participants with and without low back pain: A case-control study
Authors:Rosenstein BBurdick JRoussac ARye MNaghdi NValentin SLicka TSean MTétreault PElliott JFortin M
Link:pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38280825/
DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.111928
Publication:Journal of biomechanics
Keywords:Epimuscular fatLow back painMagnetic resonance imagingParaspinal muscles
PMID:38280825 Category: Date Added:2024-01-28
Dept Affiliation: HKAP
1 Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada. Electronic address: brent.rosenstein@icloud.com.
2 Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
3 Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada. Electronic address: alexarou@live.ca.
4 School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Electronic address: S.Valentin@napier.ac.uk.
5 Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Theresia.Licka@vetmeduni.ac.at.
6 Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Department of Anesthesiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada. Electronic address: monica.sean@USherbrooke.ca.
7 Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Department of Anesthesiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada. Electronic address: Pascal.Tetreault@USherbrooke.ca.
8 University of Sydney, School of Heath Science, Department of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: jim.elliott@sydney.edu.au.
9 Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada. Electronic address: maryse.fortin@concordia.ca.

Description:

It remains unclear whether paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration in low back pain (LBP) is i) solely intramuscular, ii) is lying outside the epimysium between the muscle and fascial plane (epimuscular) or iii) or combination of both, as imaging studies often use different segmentation protocols that are not thoroughly described. Epimuscular fat possibly disturbs force generation of paraspinal muscles, but is seldomly explored. This project aimed to 1) compare epimuscular fat in participants with and without chronic LBP, and 2) determine whether epimuscular fat is different across lumbar spinal levels and associated with BMI, age, sex and LBP status, duration or intensity. Fat and water lumbosacral MRIs of 50 chronic LBP participants and 41 healthy controls were used. The presence and extent of epimuscular fat for the paraspinal muscle group (erector spinae and multifidus) was assessed using a qualitative score (0-5 scale; 0 = no epimuscular fat and 5 = epimuscular fat present along the entire muscle) and quantitative manual segmentation method. Chi-squared tests evaluated associations between qualitative epimuscular fat ratings and LBP status at each lumbar level. Bivariate and partial spearman's rho correlation assessed relationships between quantitative and qualitative epimuscular fat with participants' characteristics. Epimuscular fat was more frequent at the L4-L5 (X<sup>2</sup> = 13.781, p = 0.017) and L5-S1 level (X<sup>2</sup> = 27.825, p < 0.001) in participants with LBP compared to controls, which was not found for the higher lumbar levels. The total qualitative score (combined from all levels) showed a significant positive correlation with BMI, age, sex (female) and LBP status (r = 0.23-0.55; p < 0.05). Similarly, the total area of epimuscular fat (quantitative measure) was significantly correlated with BMI, age and LBP status (r = 0.26-0.57; p < 0.05). No correlations were found between epimuscular fat and LBP duration or intensity. Paraspinal muscle epimuscular fat is more common in chronic LBP patients. The functional implications of epimuscular fat should be further explored.




BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University