Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Mitigation" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Land-use history causes differences in park nighttime cooling capacity and forest structure Richmond IC; Paulauskas MA; Padvaiskas E; Gonzàlez Sinisterra LC; Hutt-Taylor K; Robitaille AL; Ziter CD; 40761092
BIOLOGY
2 Protecting shorelines in Canadian Indigenous communities: Environmental challenges, policy interventions, and mitigation technologies Iravani R; Biagi M; Laforest S; Lee K; Isaacman L; Chen Z; An C; 40554913
ENCS
3 Ten new insights in climate science 2024 Schaeffer R; Schipper ELF; Ospina D; Mirazo P; Alencar A; Anvari M; Artaxo P; Biresselioglu ME; Blome T; Boeckmann M; Brink E; Broadgate W; Bustamante M; Cai W; Canadell JG; Cardinale R; Chidichimo MP; Ditlevsen P; Eicker U; Feron S; Fikru MG; Fuss S; Gaye AT; Gustafsson Ö; Harring N; He C; Hebden S; Heilemann A; Hirota M; Janardhanan N; Juhola S; Jung TY; Kejun J; Kilki? S; Kumarasinghe N; Lapola D; Lee JY; Levis C; Lusambili A; Maasakkers JD; MacIntosh C; Mahmood J; Mankin JS; Marchegiani P; Martin M; Muk 40546753
PHYSICS
4 A review on indoor airborne transmission of COVID-19- modelling and mitigation approaches Rayegan S; Shu C; Berquist J; Jeon J; Zhou LG; Wang LL; Mbareche H; Tardif P; Ge H; 40478135
ENCS
5 Integration of Membrane-Based Pretreatment Methods with Pressure-Retarded Osmosis for Performance Enhancement: A Review Pakdaman S; Nouri G; Mulligan CN; Nasiri F; 40077246
ENCS
6 Construction, renovation, and demolition waste in landfill: a review of waste characteristics, environmental impacts, and mitigation measures Chen Z; Feng Q; Yue R; Chen Z; Moselhi O; Soliman A; Hammad A; An C; 35508848
ENCS
7 COVID-19 Disruption Demonstrates Win-Win Climate Solutions for Major League Sports Seth Wynes 34779201
CONCORDIA
8 What attributes are relevant for drainage culverts to serve as efficient road crossing structures for mammals? Brunen B, Daguet C, Jaeger JAG 32510423
GEOGRAPHY
9 An adaptive plan for prioritizing road sections for fencing to reduce animal mortality. Spanowicz AG, Teixeira FZ, Jaeger JAG 32227646
GEOGRAPHY
10 Assessment of regional greenhouse gas emission from beef cattle production: A case study of Saskatchewan in Canada. Chen Z, An C, Fang H, Zhang Y, Zhou Z, Zhou Y, Zhao S 32217321
ENCS
11 How do landscape context and fences influence roadkill locations of small and medium-sized mammals? Plante J, Jaeger JAG, Desrochers A 30711836
GEOGRAPHY

 

Title:Assessment of regional greenhouse gas emission from beef cattle production: A case study of Saskatchewan in Canada.
Authors:Chen ZAn CFang HZhang YZhou ZZhou YZhao S
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32217321?dopt=Abstract
DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110443
Publication:Journal of environmental management
Keywords:Beef cattle productionClimate changeEmission assessmentGreenhouse gasMitigation measuresSensitivity analysis
PMID:32217321 Category:J Environ Manage Date Added:2020-03-29
Dept Affiliation: ENCS
1 Department of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, H3G 1M8, Canada.
2 Department of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, H3G 1M8, Canada. Electronic address: chunjiang.an@concordia.ca.
3 Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, S4S 0A2, Canada.
4 Water Science and Environmental Engineering Research Center, College of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
5 School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, China.

Description:

Assessment of regional greenhouse gas emission from beef cattle production: A case study of Saskatchewan in Canada.

J Environ Manage. 2020 Mar 25;264:110443

Authors: Chen Z, An C, Fang H, Zhang Y, Zhou Z, Zhou Y, Zhao S

Abstract

The beef cattle production has been considered as one of the largest sources of greenhouse gases (GHGs) emission. A large amount of GHGs including N2O and CH4 from enteric fermentation and manure are discharged to atmosphere during beef-production process. In addition, a substantial amount of GHGs is also emitted from many other related processes such as feed production, transportation, and energy consumption. In this study, an emission assessment model was developed to quantify the amount of regional GHGs produced from the beef cattle production process. A case study was conducted based on the beef production in Saskatchewan, Canada. The results demonstrated that the GHG emissions from the annual marketed beef cattle in Saskatchewan in 2014 were 8.52 × 109 kg CO2-eq in total and the cattle-source GHGs (enteric CH4, manure CH4, and manure N2O emission) accounted for more than 90% of the total emission. Sensitivity analysis showed that the most critical factors influencing the GHG emission included feedlot manure handling system, cattle diet, feed additives, maximum methane producing capacity (Bo), and climate (temperature, precipitation, and potential evapotranspiration). The potential impacts of climate change on GHG emission from beef cattle production in Saskatchewan were also investigated. An overall decrease in the GHG emission can be observed due to the climate change, which are 3.67%, 4.96%, and 6.63% for 2020-2039, 2040-2059, and 2060-2099, respectively.

PMID: 32217321 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University