BookR: School of Health Core Facilities Booking
PubMed Publications| Keyword search (4,164 papers available) |  |
"Guideline" Keyword-tagged Publications:
| Title | Authors | PubMed ID | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ASSOBRAFIR clinical practice guidelines in cardiovascular physical therapy: Exercise-based interventions in outpatient rehabilitation programs for heart failure | Karsten M; Gardenghi G; Arruda ACT; Catai AM; Vieira AM; Stein C; de Araujo CLP; Pereira DAG; Matte DL; da Silva FMF; Guimarães FS; Ghisi GLM; Chiappa GRS; Sbruzzi G; Cipriano GFB; Ribeiro GDS; Milani JGPO; Neves LMT; Calegari L; Morais LA; Capalonga L; Deresz LF; Lago PD; Campos PS; Macedo RM; Plentz RDM; Menezes SLS; Filho VPPS; Silva VZM; Carvalho VO; Medeiros WM; Lanza FC; Cipriano G; | 40857977 HKAP |
| 2 | Transparency and completeness of reporting of depression screening tool accuracy studies: A meta-research review of adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies statement | Nassar EL; Levis B; Neyer MA; Rice DB; Booij L; Benedetti A; Thombs BD; | 36047034 PSYCHOLOGY |
| 3 | Implementing deprescribing guidelines into frontline practice: Barriers and facilitators. | Conklin J, Farrell B, Suleman S | 30241874 CONCORDIA |
| 4 | Deprescribing guidelines: An international symposium on development, implementation, research and health professional education. | Farrell B, Conklin J, Dolovich L, Irving H, Maclure M, McCarthy L, Moriarty F, Pottie K, Raman-Wilms L, Reeve E, Thompson W | 30241875 CONCORDIA |
| 5 | Deprescribing: Future directions for research. | Thompson W, Reeve E, Moriarty F, Maclure M, Turner J, Steinman MA, Conklin J, Dolovich L, McCarthy L, Farrell B | 30241876 CONCORDIA |
| 6 | Characteristics of Canadian Youth Adhering to Physical Activity and Screen Time Recommendations. | Fitzpatrick C, Burkhalter R, Asbridge M | 31630617 PERFORM |
| Title: | Transparency and completeness of reporting of depression screening tool accuracy studies: A meta-research review of adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies statement | ||||
| Authors: | Nassar EL, Levis B, Neyer MA, Rice DB, Booij L, Benedetti A, Thombs BD | ||||
| Link: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36047034/ | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1002/mpr.1939 | ||||
| Publication: | International journal of methods in psychiatric research | ||||
| Keywords: | STARD; depression; diagnostic test accuracy; reporting guidelines; screening; | ||||
| PMID: | 36047034 | Category: | Date Added: | 2022-09-01 | |
| Dept Affiliation: |
PSYCHOLOGY
1 Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2 Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 3 Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK. 4 Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 5 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 6 CHU Sainte-Justine Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 7 Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 8 Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 9 Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 10 Department of Educational and Counselling |
||||
Description: |
Objectives: Accurate and complete study reporting allows evidence users to critically appraise studies, evaluate possible bias, and assess generalizability and applicability. We evaluated the extent to which recent studies on depression screening accuracy were reported consistent with Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) statement requirements. Methods: MEDLINE was searched from January 1, 2018 through May 21, 2021 for depression screening accuracy studies. Results: 106 studies were included. Of 34 STARD items or sub-items, the number of adequately reported items per study ranged from 7 to 18 (mean = 11.5, standard deviation [SD] = 2.5; median = 11.5), and the number inadequately reported ranged from 3 to 17 (mean = 10.1, SD = 2.5; median = 10.0). There were eight items adequately reported, seven partially reported, 11 inadequately reported, and four not applicable in =50% of studies; the remaining four items had mixed reporting. Items inadequately reported in =70% of studies related to the rationale for index test cut-offs examined, missing data management, analyses of variability in accuracy results, sample size determination, participant flow, study registration, and study protocol. Conclusion: Recently published depression screening accuracy studies are not optimally reported. Journals should endorse and implement STARD adherence. |
