| Keyword search (4,163 papers available) | ![]() |
"Bubble dynamics" Keyword-tagged Publications:
| Title | Authors | PubMed ID | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The effect of micro-vessel viscosity on the resonance response of a two-microbubble system | Yusefi H; Helfield B; | 39705920 BIOLOGY |
| 2 | The influence of inter-bubble spacing on the resonance response of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles | Yusefi H; Helfield B; | 36223708 BIOLOGY |
| Title: | The influence of inter-bubble spacing on the resonance response of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles | ||||
| Authors: | Yusefi H, Helfield B | ||||
| Link: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36223708/ | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106191 | ||||
| Publication: | Ultrasonics sonochemistry | ||||
| Keywords: | Bubble dynamics; Cavitation; Finite element; Nanobubbles; Non-spherical vibration; Nonlinear; | ||||
| PMID: | 36223708 | Category: | Date Added: | 2022-10-27 | |
| Dept Affiliation: |
BIOLOGY
1 Department of Physics, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec H4B 1R6, Canada. 2 Department of Physics, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec H4B 1R6, Canada; Department of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec H4B 1R6, Canada. Electronic address: brandon.helfield@concordia.ca. |
||||
Description: |
Ultrasound-driven microbubbles, typically between 1 and 8 µm in diameter, are resonant scatterers that are employed as diagnostic contrast agents and emerging as potentiators of targeted therapies. Microbubbles are administered in populations whereby their radial dynamics - key to their effectiveness - are greatly affected by intrinsic (e.g. bubble size) and extrinsic (e.g. boundaries) factors. In this work, we aim to understand how two neighbouring microbubbles influence each other. We developed a finite element model of a system of two individual phospholipid-encapsulated microbubbles vibrating in proximity to each other to study the effect of inter-bubble distance on microbubble radial resonance response. For the case of two equal-sized and identical bubbles, each bubble exhibits a decrease between 7 and 10% in the frequency of maximum response (fMR) and an increase in amplitude of maximum response (AMR) by 9-11% as compared to its isolated response in free-space, depending on the bubble size examined. For a system of two unequal-sized microbubbles, the large bubble shows no significant change, however the smaller microbubble shows an increase in fMR by 7-11% and a significant decrease in AMR by 38-52%. Furthermore, in very close proximity the small bubble shows a secondary off-resonance peak at the corresponding fMR of its larger companion microbubble. Our work suggests that frequency-dependent microbubble response is greatly affected by the presence of another bubble, which has implications in both imaging and therapy applications. Furthermore, our work suggests a mechanism by which nanobubbles show significant off-resonance vibrations in the clinical frequency range, a behaviour that has been observed experimentally but heretofore unexplained. |



