Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Agency" Keyword-tagged Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Scapegoated communities, shared struggles: A call for solidarity with people who use drugs and queer and trans people London-Nadeau K; Barborini C; Haines-Saah R; Bazarov M; Bristowe S; Khorkhordina M; Lemay-Gaulin M; Gorka C; Juster RP; D' Alessio H; Chadi N; 40633507
PSYCHOLOGY
2 Who Should Decide How Machines Make Morally Laden Decisions? Dominic Martin 27905083
JMSB
3 Second Opinions: Negotiating Agency in Online Mothering Forums. Aston M, Price S, Hunter A, Sim M, Etowa J, Monaghan J, Paynter M 32757828
CONCORDIA
4 A self-initiated cue-reward learning procedure for neural recording in rodents. Reverte I, Volz S, Alhazmi FH, Kang M, Kaufman K, Chan S, Jou C, Iordanova MD, Esber GR 32135212
CSBN
5 Infants attribute false beliefs to a toy crane Burnside K; Severdija V; Poulin-Dubois D; 31309631
CRDH
6 Agency and Motivation in Adulthood and Old Age. Heckhausen J, Wrosch C, Schulz R 30110574
PSYCHOLOGY

 

Title:Who Should Decide How Machines Make Morally Laden Decisions?
Authors:Dominic Martin
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27905083/
DOI:10.1007/s11948-016-9833-7
Publication:Science and engineering ethics
Keywords:Artificial intelligenceCollective decision-makingEconomic efficiencyEthicsMarket freedomMoral agencyPublic policiesRegulationSelf-driving car
PMID:27905083 Category: Date Added:2016-12-02
Dept Affiliation: JMSB
1 John Molson School of Business, Concordia University, Montréal, Canada. dominic.martin@concordia.ca.
2 Department of Philosophy, McGill University, Montréal, Canada. dominic.martin@concordia.ca.

Description:

Who should decide how a machine will decide what to do when it is driving a car, performing a medical procedure, or, more generally, when it is facing any kind of morally laden decision? More and more, machines are making complex decisions with a considerable level of autonomy. We should be much more preoccupied by this problem than we currently are. After a series of preliminary remarks, this paper will go over four possible answers to the question raised above. First, we may claim that it is the maker of a machine that gets to decide how it will behave in morally laden scenarios. Second, we may claim that the users of a machine should decide. Third, that decision may have to be made collectively or, fourth, by other machines built for this special purpose. The paper argues that each of these approaches suffers from its own shortcomings, and it concludes by showing, among other things, which approaches should be emphasized for different types of machines, situations, and/or morally laden decisions.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University