BookR: School of Health Core Facilities Booking
PubMed Publications| Keyword search (4,163 papers available) |  |
"Stojanovic J" Authored Publications:
| Title | Authors | PubMed ID | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Addressing vaccine hesitancy: A systematic review comparing the efficacy of motivational versus educational interventions on vaccination uptake | Labbé S; Bacon SL; Wu N; Ribeiro PAB; Boucher VG; Stojanovic J; Voisard B; Deslauriers F; Tremblay N; Hébert-Auger L; Lavoie KL; | 40167044 HKAP |
| 2 | Understanding the Components of Eating Behaviour-Focused Weight Management Interventions Adjunct to Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: Systematic Review of Published Literature | Yousefi R; Ben-Porat T; O' Neill J; Boucher VG; Stojanovic J; Fortin A; Lavoie KL; Bacon SL; | 39753946 HKAP |
| 3 | Identifying priority questions regarding rapid systematic reviews' methods: protocol for an eDelphi study | Vieira AM; Szczepanik G; de Waure C; Tricco AC; Oliver S; Stojanovic J; Ribeiro PAB; Pollock D; Akl EA; Lavis J; Kuchenmuller T; Bragge P; Langer L; Bacon S; | 37419644 HKAP |
| 4 | Long-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against infections, hospitalisations, and mortality in adults: findings from a rapid living systematic evidence synthesis and meta-analysis up to December, 2022 | Wu N; Joyal-Desmarais K; Ribeiro PAB; Vieira AM; Stojanovic J; Sanuade C; Yip D; Bacon SL; | 36780914 HKAP |
| 5 | How well do covariates perform when adjusting for sampling bias in online COVID-19 research? Insights from multiverse analyses | Joyal-Desmarais K; Stojanovic J; Kennedy EB; Enticott JC; Boucher VG; Vo H; Košir U; Lavoie KL; Bacon SL; | 36335560 HKAP |
| 6 | Survey of Professionals of the European Public Health Association (EUPHA) towards Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing | Beccia F; Hoxhaj I; Sassano M; Stojanovic J; Acampora A; Pastorino R; Boccia S; | 36179240 HKAP |
| 7 | Understanding national trends in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Canada: results from five sequential cross-sectional representative surveys spanning April 2020-March 2021 | Lavoie K; Gosselin-Boucher V; Stojanovic J; Gupta S; Gagné M; Joyal-Desmarais K; Séguin K; Gorin SS; Ribeiro P; Voisard B; Vallis M; Corace K; Presseau J; Bacon S; | 35383087 HKAP |
| 8 | Food Addiction and Binge Eating Impact on Weight Loss Outcomes Two Years Following Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery | Ben-Porat T; Košir U; Peretz S; Sherf-Dagan S; Stojanovic J; Sakran N; | 35048249 HKAP |
| 9 | Public perceptions and behavioural responses to the first COVID-19 pandemic wave in Italy: Results from the iCARE study | Stojanovic J; Raparelli V; Boccia S; Bacon SL; Lavoie KL; | 34406384 HKAP |
| 10 | Coding Public Health Interventions for Health Technology Assessments: A Pilot Experience With WHO's International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI) | Wübbeler M; Geis S; Stojanovic J; Elliott L; Gutierrez-Ibarluzea I; Lenoir-Wijnkoop I; | 34222165 HKAP |
| 11 | Global Trends and Correlates of COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy: Findings from the iCARE Study | Stojanovic J; Boucher VG; Gagne M; Gupta S; Joyal-Desmarais K; Paduano S; Aburub AS; Sheinfeld Gorin SN; Kassianos AP; Ribeiro PAB; Bacon SL; Lavoie KL; | 34204379 HKAP |
| 12 | Core Competencies in Cancer Genomics for Healthcare Professionals: Results From a Systematic Literature Review and a Delphi Process. | Hoxhaj I, Tognetto A, Acampora A, Stojanovic J, Boccia S | 33442861 HKAP |
| 13 | Adult height and risk of gastric cancer: a pooled analysis within the Stomach cancer Pooling Project. | Giraldi L, Stojanovic J, Arzani D, Persiani R, Hu J, Johnson KC, Zhang ZF, Ferraroni M, Palli D, Yu GP, La Vecchia C, Pelucchi C, Lunet N, Ferro A, Malekzadeh R, Muscat J, Zaridze D, Maximovich D, Aragones N, Martin V, Vioque J, Navarrete-Munoz EM, Pakseresht M, Negri E, Rota M, Pourfarzi F, Mu L, Kurtz RC, Lagiou A, Lagiou P, Pastorino R, Boccia S | 32925512 HKAP |
| 14 | Evaluating Public Health Interventions: A Neglected Area in Health Technology Assessment. | Stojanovic J, Wübbeler M, Geis S, Reviriego E, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I, Lenoir-Wijnkoop I | 32391300 HKAP |
| 15 | European citizens' perspectives on direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an updated systematic review. | Hoxhaj I, Stojanovic J, Boccia S | 32361734 HKAP |
| 16 | A review of the legislation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in EU member states. | Hoxhaj I, Stojanovic J, Sassano M, Acampora A, Boccia S | 31923586 HKAP |
| Title: | Identifying priority questions regarding rapid systematic reviews' methods: protocol for an eDelphi study | ||||
| Authors: | Vieira AM, Szczepanik G, de Waure C, Tricco AC, Oliver S, Stojanovic J, Ribeiro PAB, Pollock D, Akl EA, Lavis J, Kuchenmuller T, Bragge P, Langer L, Bacon S | ||||
| Link: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37419644/ | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069856 | ||||
| Publication: | BMJ open | ||||
| Keywords: | health economics; health policy; public health; statistics &; research methods; | ||||
| PMID: | 37419644 | Category: | Date Added: | 2023-07-08 | |
| Dept Affiliation: |
HKAP
1 Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, Canada. 2 Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada. 3 Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. 4 Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5 University College London Institute of Education, London, UK. 6 Health Evidence Synthesis, Recommendations and Impact, School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 7 Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 8 Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 9 McMaster Health Forum and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 10 Affiliate Scientist, Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. 11 Research for Health Department,Science Division, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 12 Monash Sustainable Development Institute Evidence Review Service, BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 13 South Africa Centre for Evidence, Johannesburg, South Africa. 14 Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, Canada simon.bacon@concordia.ca. |
||||
Description: |
Introduction: Rapid systematic reviews (RRs) have the potential to provide timely information to decision-makers, thus directly impacting healthcare. However, consensus regarding the most efficient approaches to performing RRs and the presence of several unaddressed methodological issues pose challenges. With such a large potential research agenda for RRs, it is unclear what should be prioritised. Objective: To elicit a consensus from RR experts and interested parties on what are the most important methodological questions (from the generation of the question to the writing of the report) for the field to address in order to guide the effective and efficient development of RRs. Methods and analysis: An eDelphi study will be conducted. Researchers with experience in evidence synthesis and other interested parties (eg, knowledge users, patients, community members, policymaker, industry, journal editors and healthcare providers) will be invited to participate. The following steps will be taken: (1) a core group of experts in evidence synthesis will generate the first list of items based on the available literature; (2) using LimeSurvey, participants will be invited to rate and rank the importance of suggested RR methodological questions. Questions with open format responses will allow for modifications to the wording of items or the addition of new items; (3) three survey rounds will be performed asking participants to re-rate items, with items deemed of low importance being removed at each round; (4) a list of items will be generated with items believed to be of high importance by =75% of participants being included and (5) this list will be discussed at an online consensus meeting that will generate a summary document containing the final priority list. Data analysis will be performed using raw numbers, means and frequencies. Ethics and dissemination: This study was approved by the Concordia University Human Research Ethics Committee (#30015229). Both traditional, for example, scientific conference presentations and publication in scientific journals, and non-traditional, for example, lay summaries and infographics, knowledge translation products will be created. |
