BookR: School of Health Core Facilities Booking
PubMed Publications| Keyword search (4,163 papers available) |  |
"Ribeiro PAB" Authored Publications:
| Title | Authors | PubMed ID | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Addressing vaccine hesitancy: A systematic review comparing the efficacy of motivational versus educational interventions on vaccination uptake | Labbé S; Bacon SL; Wu N; Ribeiro PAB; Boucher VG; Stojanovic J; Voisard B; Deslauriers F; Tremblay N; Hébert-Auger L; Lavoie KL; | 40167044 HKAP |
| 2 | Identifying priority questions regarding rapid systematic reviews' methods: protocol for an eDelphi study | Vieira AM; Szczepanik G; de Waure C; Tricco AC; Oliver S; Stojanovic J; Ribeiro PAB; Pollock D; Akl EA; Lavis J; Kuchenmuller T; Bragge P; Langer L; Bacon S; | 37419644 HKAP |
| 3 | Methods to assess ambivalence towards food and diet: a scoping review | Hayashi D; Carvalho SDL; Ribeiro PAB; Rodrigues RCM; São-João TM; Lavoie K; Bacon S; Cornélio ME; | 37226601 HKAP |
| 4 | Long-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against infections, hospitalisations, and mortality in adults: findings from a rapid living systematic evidence synthesis and meta-analysis up to December, 2022 | Wu N; Joyal-Desmarais K; Ribeiro PAB; Vieira AM; Stojanovic J; Sanuade C; Yip D; Bacon SL; | 36780914 HKAP |
| 5 | Methods to assess ambivalence towards food and diet: a scoping review protocol | Hayashi Neto D; Carvalho SDL; Ribeiro PAB; Lavoie KL; Bacon SL; Cornélio ME; | 34812190 HKAP |
| 6 | Immediate physiological effects of acute electronic cigarette use in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis | Larue F; Tasbih T; Ribeiro PAB; Lavoie KL; Dolan E; Bacon SL; | 34808583 HKAP |
| 7 | Global Trends and Correlates of COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy: Findings from the iCARE Study | Stojanovic J; Boucher VG; Gagne M; Gupta S; Joyal-Desmarais K; Paduano S; Aburub AS; Sheinfeld Gorin SN; Kassianos AP; Ribeiro PAB; Bacon SL; Lavoie KL; | 34204379 HKAP |
| 8 | Behavioral weight management interventions in metabolic and bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating optimal delivery timing. | Julien CA, Lavoie KL, Ribeiro PAB, Dragomir AI, Mercier LA, Garneau PY, Pescarus R, Bacon SL | 33403754 HKAP |
| Title: | Methods to assess ambivalence towards food and diet: a scoping review protocol | ||||
| Authors: | Hayashi Neto D, Carvalho SDL, Ribeiro PAB, Lavoie KL, Bacon SL, Cornélio ME | ||||
| Link: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34812190/ | ||||
| DOI: | 10.11124/JBIES-21-00058 | ||||
| Publication: | JBI evidence synthesis | ||||
| Keywords: | |||||
| PMID: | 34812190 | Category: | Date Added: | 2021-11-23 | |
| Dept Affiliation: |
HKAP
1 School of Nursing (FEnf), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre (MBMC), CIUSSS-NIM, Montreal, QC, Canada Department of Psychology, University of Quebec at Montreal (UQAM), Montreal, QC, Canada Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada. |
||||
Description: |
Objective: This scoping review aims to identify and understand the different tools and methods used in studies in the field of human eating behavior to assess, measure, or classify participants' ambivalence towards food and diet, as well as to identify which tools and methods are most frequently employed. Introduction: People's attitudes towards foods and eating behaviors are often ambivalent (simultaneously positive and negative), making it harder to change eating behaviors in favor of a healthier diet. This highlights the importance of resolving diet-related ambivalence. Identifying and understanding the different methods used in the literature to assess attitudinal ambivalence towards food and diet will provide researchers with a range of options to choose from for future studies. Inclusion criteria: We will include peer-reviewed studies as well as preprints that assess the ambivalence of human participants towards food and diet, regardless of sex, age, or other sociodemographic factors. We will exclude studies in which the methods used to assess ambivalence aren't detailed or can't be reproduced, as well as studies that assessed the ambivalence of participants towards farming and agricultural methods or towards methods of food production and preparation. Methods: This review will follow JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Peer-reviewed studies will be retrieved from MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Food Science Source, FSTA, and CINAHL, and preprints will be retrieved from PsyArXiv and MedArXiv. Two independent reviewers will screen the articles. All relevant extracted information will be presented as tables and a descriptive summary of the findings. |
