| Keyword search (4,163 papers available) | ![]() |
"R Peres-Neto P" Authored Publications:
| Title | Authors | PubMed ID | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Games researchers play: conceptual advancement versus validation strategies | Dubois F; R Peres-Neto P; | 35193771 BIOLOGY |
| Title: | Games researchers play: conceptual advancement versus validation strategies | ||||
| Authors: | Dubois F, R Peres-Neto P | ||||
| Link: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35193771/ | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.tree.2022.02.003 | ||||
| Publication: | Trends in ecology & evolution | ||||
| Keywords: | conceptual advancement; public goods game; replication; research; validation; | ||||
| PMID: | 35193771 | Category: | Date Added: | 2022-02-23 | |
| Dept Affiliation: |
BIOLOGY
1 Département de Sciences Biologiques, Complexe des Sciences, Université de Montréal, 1375 Avenue Thérèse-Lavoie-Roux, Montréal, (QC) H2V 0B3, Canada. 2 Department of Biology Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, (QC), H4B 1R6, Canada. Electronic address: pedro.peres-neto@concordia.ca. |
||||
Description: |
Conceptual advances and validation are critical to research, yet at odds. Using a game theoretical perspective, we show that a mixed strategy combining advances and validation, leads to increases in both individual researchers' and societal gains. This win-win outcome can be used to design new research strategies, funding, and recognition standards. |



