BookR: School of Health Core Facilities Booking
PubMed Publications| Keyword search (4,163 papers available) |  |
"Matthews HD" Authored Publications:
| Title | Authors | PubMed ID | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Geological Net Zero and the need for disaggregated accounting for carbon sinks | Allen MR; Frame DJ; Friedlingstein P; Gillett NP; Grassi G; Gregory JM; Hare W; House J; Huntingford C; Jenkins S; Jones CD; Knutti R; Lowe JA; Matthews HD; Meinshausen M; Meinshausen N; Peters GP; Plattner GK; Raper S; Rogelj J; Stott PA; Solomon S; Stocker TF; Weaver AJ; Zickfeld K; | 39557072 PHYSICS |
| 2 | Perceptions of carbon dioxide emission reductions and future warming among climate experts | Wynes S; Davis SJ; Dickau M; Ly S; Maibach E; Rogelj J; Zickfeld K; Matthews HD; | 39280638 CONCORDIA |
| 3 | Digitizing natureGaia's Web Karen Bakker MIT Press, 2024. 288 pp | Garard J; Matthews HD; | 38574131 CONCORDIA |
| 4 | Accounting for the climate benefit of temporary carbon storage in nature | Matthews HD; Zickfeld K; Koch A; Luers A; | 37679349 CONCORDIA |
| 5 | Mothers of disabled infants had higher cortisol levels in a free-ranging group of Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) | Turner SE; Fedigan LM; Joyce MM; Matthews HD; Moriarity RJ; Nobuhara H; Nobuhara T; Stewart BM; Shimizu K; | 37189289 CONCORDIA |
| 6 | Moderate support for the use of digital tracking to support climate-mitigation strategies | Garard J; Wood SLR; Sabet-Kassouf N; Ventimiglia A; Matthews HD; Ubalijoro É; Chaudhari K; Ivanova M; Luers AL; | 36128017 ENCS |
| 7 | Current global efforts are insufficient to limit warming to 1.5°C | Matthews HD; Wynes S; | 35737785 GEOGRAPHY |
| 8 | Exposure to excessive heat and impacts on labour productivity linked to cumulative CO2 emissions. | Chavaillaz Y, Roy P, Partanen AI, Da Silva L, Bresson É, Mengis N, Chaumont D, Matthews HD | 31548555 GEOGRAPHY |
| 9 | A real-time Global Warming Index. | Haustein K, Allen MR, Forster PM, Otto FEL, Mitchell DM, Matthews HD, Frame DJ | 29133863 PHYSICS |
| Title: | Moderate support for the use of digital tracking to support climate-mitigation strategies | ||||
| Authors: | Garard J, Wood SLR, Sabet-Kassouf N, Ventimiglia A, Matthews HD, Ubalijoro É, Chaudhari K, Ivanova M, Luers AL | ||||
| Link: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36128017/ | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.08.005 | ||||
| Publication: | One earth (Cambridge, Mass.) | ||||
| Keywords: | COVID-19; climate change; collective action; digital surveillance; digital tracking; | ||||
| PMID: | 36128017 | Category: | Date Added: | 2022-09-21 | |
| Dept Affiliation: |
ENCS
1 Sustainability in the Digital Age, Montreal, QC, Canada. 2 Future Earth, Montreal, QC, Canada. 3 Concordia University, Department of Geography, Planning, and Environment, Montreal, QC, Canada. 4 Shah and Anchor Kutchhi Engineering College, Mumbai, India. 5 Institute for Sustainable Development and Research, Mumbai, India. 6 University of Massachusetts Boston, Department of Conflict Resolution, Human Security, and Global Governance, Boston, MA, USA. 7 Center for Governance and Sustainability, Boston, MA, USA. |
||||
Description: |
The use of digital tracking of individuals throughout the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic renewed societal debates on the efficacy and ethics of digital surveillance to mitigate collective crises. While digital emissions tracking is being used to support climate-mitigation strategies, to date there has been limited exploration of the opportunities and challenges of deploying it at the individual level. Here, we assess temporal and regional differences in levels of support for the use of digital surveillance in times of crisis, such as climate change. Results from a global survey indicate moderate support for the use of digital tracking, including for personal carbon footprints. Response varied regionally, with the lowest support in North America and Europe. This study raises key questions-if digital surveillance tools could be part of a socially acceptable response to the climate crisis, is it worth exploring? Or is this an unacceptable risk for society? |
