BookR: School of Health Core Facilities Booking
PubMed Publications| Keyword search (4,163 papers available) |  |
"Hooshiar A" Authored Publications:
| Title | Authors | PubMed ID | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A usability analysis of augmented reality and haptics for surgical planning | Kazemipour N; Hooshiar A; Kersten-Oertel M; | 38942947 ENCS |
| 2 | Design Optimization of a Hybrid-Driven Soft Surgical Robot with Biomimetic Constraints | Roshanfar M; Dargahi J; Hooshiar A; | 38275456 ENCS |
| 3 | Hyperelastic Modeling and Validation of Hybrid-Actuated Soft Robot with Pressure-Stiffening | Roshanfar M; Taki S; Sayadi A; Cecere R; Dargahi J; Hooshiar A; | 37241524 ENCS |
| 4 | Toward Task Autonomy in Robotic Cardiac Ablation: Learning-Based Kinematic Control of Soft Tendon-Driven Catheters. | Jolaei M, Hooshiar A, Dargahi J, Packirisamy M | 32678722 ENCS |
| 5 | Development and assessment of a stiffness display system for minimally invasive surgery based on smart magneto-rheological elastomers. | Hooshiar A, Alkhalaf A, Dargahi J | 31924050 ENCS |
| Title: | A usability analysis of augmented reality and haptics for surgical planning | ||||
| Authors: | Kazemipour N, Hooshiar A, Kersten-Oertel M | ||||
| Link: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38942947/ | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11548-024-03207-x | ||||
| Publication: | International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery | ||||
| Keywords: | Augmented reality; Haptics; Surgical planning; Virtual reality; | ||||
| PMID: | 38942947 | Category: | Date Added: | 2024-06-29 | |
| Dept Affiliation: |
ENCS
1 Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science, Concordia University, 1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. W., Montreal, QC, H3G 1M8, Canada. negaarkazemipour@gmail.com. 2 Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada. 3 Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science, Concordia University, 1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. W., Montreal, QC, H3G 1M8, Canada. |
||||
Description: |
Purpose: Proper visualization and interaction with complex anatomical data can improve understanding, allowing for more intuitive surgical planning. The goal of our work was to study what the most intuitive yet practical platforms for interacting with 3D medical data are in the context of surgical planning. Methods: We compared planning using a monitor and mouse, a monitor with a haptic device, and an augmented reality (AR) head-mounted display which uses a gesture-based interaction. To determine the most intuitive system, two user studies, one with novices and one with experts, were conducted. The studies involved planning of three scenarios: (1) heart valve repair, (2) hip tumor resection, and (3) pedicle screw placement. Task completion time, NASA Task Load Index and system-specific questionnaires were used for the evaluation. Results: Both novices and experts preferred the AR system for pedicle screw placement. Novices preferred the haptic system for hip tumor planning, while experts preferred the mouse and keyboard. In the case of heart valve planning, novices preferred the AR system but there was no clear preference for experts. Both groups reported that AR provides the best spatial depth perception. Conclusion: The results of the user studies suggest that different surgical cases may benefit from varying interaction and visualization methods. For example, for planning surgeries with implants and instrumentations, mixed reality could provide better 3D spatial perception, whereas using landmarks for delineating specific targets may be more effective using a traditional 2D interface. |
