Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"Dunfield KA" Authored Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Individual differences in empathy-related responses in early childhood: A person-centred approach Bullinger J; Christner N; Urian R; Kellermann CM; Beaulieu S; Steinbeis N; Dunfield KA; Paulus M; 41888065
PSYCHOLOGY
2 Prosocial responses to diverse needs in urban Canadian and rural Tzotzil Maya children Dunfield KA; Urian R; Tavassoli N; Kleis A; 39977679
PSYCHOLOGY
3 Helpers or halos: examining the evaluative mechanisms underlying selective prosociality Dunfield KA; Isler L; Chang XM; Terrizzi B; Beier J; 37035290
PSYCHOLOGY
4 Examining the influence of shyness on children's helping and comforting behaviour Karasewich TA; Hines C; Pinheiro SGV; Buchenrieder N; Dunfield KA; Kuhlmeier VA; 36923150
PSYCHOLOGY
5 Children's use of communicative intent in the selection of cooperative partners. Dunfield KA, Kuhlmeier VA, Murphy L 23626731
PSYCHOLOGY
6 Motivating Moral Behavior: Helping, Sharing, and Comforting in Young Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Dunfield KA, Best LJ, Kelley EA, Kuhlmeier VA 30728793
PSYCHOLOGY

 

Title:Helpers or halos: examining the evaluative mechanisms underlying selective prosociality
Authors:Dunfield KAIsler LChang XMTerrizzi BBeier J
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37035290/
DOI:10.1098/rsos.221188
Publication:Royal Society open science
Keywords:altruismpartner choiceprosocial behaviourreciprocitysocial cognition
PMID:37035290 Category: Date Added:2023-04-10
Dept Affiliation: PSYCHOLOGY
1 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Ouest, PY-146, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4B 1R6.
2 Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
3 Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
4 Independent Scholar, Washington, DC, USA.

Description:

This research examines the proximate evaluative mechanisms underlying prosocial partner choice-based reciprocity. Across four studies we presented 855 university undergraduates (online for course credit) and 76 4- to 6-year-olds (offline at a university laboratory) with vignettes describing prosocial, social and non-social characters, and asked participants about their person preferences in prosocial, social and general contexts. Adults demonstrated sophisticated appraisals, coordinating between relevant trait and contextual cues to make selections. Adults were particularly attentive to prosocial cues in costly conditions, suggesting that they were using dispositional attributions to make their selections. By contrast, children were largely unable to integrate trait and contextual cues in determining their partner preferences, instead displaying valenced preferences for non-social cues, suggesting the use of affective tagging. Together, these studies demonstrate that the mechanisms underlying prosocial, partner choice-based reciprocity are not early emerging and stable but show considerable development over the lifespan.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University