Keyword search (4,163 papers available)

"DeMont R" Authored Publications:

Title Authors PubMed ID
1 Comparison of Combined Motor Control Training and Isolated Extensor Strengthening Versus General Exercise on Lumbar Paraspinal Muscle Health and Associations With Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Rosenstein B; Rye M; Roussac A; Naghdi N; Macedo LG; Elliott J; DeMont R; Weber MH; Pepin V; Dover G; Fortin M; 40066720
SOH
2 The Effects of Combined Motor Control and Isolated Extensor Strengthening versus General Exercise on Paraspinal Muscle Morphology, Composition, and Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Fortin M; Rye M; Roussac A; Montpetit C; Burdick J; Naghdi N; Rosenstein B; Bertrand C; Macedo LG; Elliott JM; Dover G; DeMont R; Weber MH; Pepin V; 37762861
PERFORM
3 Patient Outcomes After Treatment by Athletic Therapy Students Lebel FB; DeMont R; Eberman LE; Dover GC; 35439310
HKAP
4 The effects of combined motor control and isolated extensor strengthening versus general exercise on paraspinal muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial protocol Fortin M; Rye M; Roussac A; Naghdi N; Macedo LG; Dover G; Elliott JM; DeMont R; Weber MH; Pepin V; 34022854
PERFORM
5 Moderate to Substantial Inter-Rater Reliability in the Assessment of Cranial Bone Mobility Restrictions. Demers K, Morin C, Collette L, DeMont R 33395535
HKAP
6 Knee joint kinematics and neuromuscular responses in female athletes during and after multi-directional perturbations. Damavandi M, Mahendrarajah L, Dixon PC, DeMont R 32217214
HKAP

 

Title:Patient Outcomes After Treatment by Athletic Therapy Students
Authors:Lebel FBDeMont REberman LEDover GC
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35439310/
DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-0589.20
Publication:Journal of athletic training
Keywords:disabilityinjurylow back painrehabilitation
PMID:35439310 Category: Date Added:2022-04-19
Dept Affiliation: HKAP
1 Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
2 Neuromechanics, Interventions, and Continuing Education Research (NICER) Laboratory, Indiana State University, Terre Haute.

Description:

Context: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) should be used in athletic training and athletic therapy but are rarely incorporated in internships. Student-run clinics are common in other health professions and provide effective treatment and valuable learning environments. To our knowledge, no one has evaluated rehabilitation outcomes in patients treated by athletic therapy students (ATSs).

Objective: To measure the improvement in function in injured patients seeking treatment at an ATS clinic.

Design: Cohort study.

Setting: An ATS clinic.

Patients or other participants: A total of 59 patients (32 women, age = 33.9 ± 14.7 years; 27 men, age = 38 ± 14.4 years) from the community with a variety of low back, lower extremity, and upper extremity injuries participated.

Main outcome measure(s): At baseline and 6-week follow-up, all patients completed 1 of 3 scales (depending on their injury location) to assess their injured level of function. Scales were the Oswestry Disability Index for low back injuries; Lower Extremity Functional Scale for lower extremity injuries; and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand for upper extremity injuries.

Results: On average, patients received 4.7 ± 1.8 treatments across 48.8 ± 16.1 days. They experienced an increase in function between baseline and follow-up assessments (18.8% ± 20.3%; P < .001, Cohen d = 1.06). Moreover, the amount of functional improvement was clinically meaningful, as it was greater than the minimal clinically important difference for each scale. The efficacy of treatments did not differ according to the internship experiences of the ATSs.

Conclusions: Function improved in patients after treatment delivered by an ATS. Patient-reported outcome measures were useful for the students in monitoring patient improvement, but more research is needed regarding effective treatments for patients with chronic pain. Our results suggested that ATS clinics provide effective treatments for patients, service to the community, and a learning opportunity for students.





BookR developed by Sriram Narayanan
for the Concordia University School of Health
Copyright © 2011-2026
Cookie settings
Concordia University