1 Sustainability in the Digital Age, Montreal, QC, Canada.
2 Future Earth, Montreal, QC, Canada.
3 Concordia University, Department of Geography, Planning, and Environment, Montreal, QC, Canada.
4 Shah and Anchor Kutchhi Engineering College, Mumbai, India.
5 Institute for Sustainable Development and Research, Mumbai, India.
6 University of Massachusetts Boston, Department of Conflict Resolution, Human Security, and Global Governance, Boston, MA, USA.
7 Center for Governance and Sustainability, Boston, MA, USA.

The use of digital tracking of individuals throughout the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic renewed societal debates on the efficacy and ethics of digital surveillance to mitigate collective crises. While digital emissions tracking is being used to support climate-mitigation strategies, to date there has been limited exploration of the opportunities and challenges of deploying it at the individual level. Here, we assess temporal and regional differences in levels of support for the use of digital surveillance in times of crisis, such as climate change. Results from a global survey indicate moderate support for the use of digital tracking, including for personal carbon footprints. Response varied regionally, with the lowest support in North America and Europe. This study raises key questions-if digital surveillance tools could be part of a socially acceptable response to the climate crisis, is it worth exploring? Or is this an unacceptable risk for society?