1 School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation, Constance Lethbridge Rehabilitation Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: shawn.robbins@mcgill.ca.
2 School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: caplan.ryan@gmail.com.
3 PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: daniel.aponte@mail.mcgill.ca.
4 Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation, Constance Lethbridge Rehabilitation Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Exercise Science, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: Nancy.St-Onge@concordia.ca.

Test-retest reliability of a balance testing protocol with external perturbations in young healthy adults.

Gait Posture. 2017 10;58:433-439

Authors: Robbins SM, Caplan RM, Aponte DI, St-Onge N

Abstract

External perturbations are utilized to challenge balance and mimic realistic balance threats in patient populations. The reliability of such protocols has not been established. The purpose was to examine test-retest reliability of balance testing with external perturbations. Healthy adults (n=34; mean age 23 years) underwent balance testing over two visits. Participants completed ten balance conditions in which the following parameters were combined: perturbation or non-perturbation, single or double leg, and eyes open or closed. Three trials were collected for each condition. Data were collected on a force plate and external perturbations were applied by translating the plate. Force plate center of pressure (CoP) data were summarized using 13 different CoP measures. Test-retest reliability was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. CoP measures of total speed and excursion in both anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions generally had acceptable ICC values for perturbation conditions (ICC=0.46 to 0.87); however, many other CoP measures (e.g. range, area of ellipse) had unacceptable test-retest reliability (ICC<0.70). Improved CoP measures were present on the second visit indicating a potential learning effect. Non-perturbation conditions generally produced more reliable CoP measures than perturbation conditions during double leg standing, but not single leg standing. Therefore, changes to balance testing protocols that include external perturbations should be made to improve test-retest reliability and diminish learning including more extensive participant training and increasing the number of trials. CoP measures that consider all data points (e.g. total speed) are more reliable than those that only consider a few data points.

PMID: 28910656 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]