Reset filters

Search publications


Search by keyword
List by department / centre / faculty

No publications found.

 

Anthropogenic and natural methane emissions from a shale gas exploration area of Quebec, Canada.

Authors: Pinti DLGelinas YMoritz AMLarocque MSano Y


Affiliations

1 GEOTOP and Département des sciences de la Terre et de l'atmosphère, Université du Québec à Montréal, CP 8888, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC H3C 1P8, Canada. Electronic address: pinti.daniele@uqam.ca.
2 GEOTOP and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada.
3 GEOTOP and Département des sciences de la Terre et de l'atmosphère, Université du Québec à Montréal, CP 8888, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC H3C 1P8, Canada.
4 Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8564, Japan; Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 106, Taiwan.

Description

Anthropogenic and natural methane emissions from a shale gas exploration area of Quebec, Canada.

Sci Total Environ. 2016 Oct 01;566-567:1329-1338

Authors: Pinti DL, Gelinas Y, Moritz AM, Larocque M, Sano Y

Abstract

The increasing number of studies on the determination of natural methane in groundwater of shale gas prospection areas offers a unique opportunity for refining the quantification of natural methane emissions. Here methane emissions, computed from four potential sources, are reported for an area of ca. 16,500km(2) of the St. Lawrence Lowlands, Quebec (Canada), where Utica shales are targeted by the petroleum industry. Methane emissions can be caused by 1) groundwater degassing as a result of groundwater abstraction for domestic and municipal uses; 2) groundwater discharge along rivers; 3) migration to the surface by (macro- and micro-) diffuse seepage; 4) degassing of hydraulic fracturing fluids during first phases of drilling. Methane emissions related to groundwater discharge to rivers (2.47×10(-4) to 9.35×10(-3)Tgyr(-1)) surpass those of diffuse seepage (4.13×10(-6) to 7.14×10(-5)Tgyr(-1)) and groundwater abstraction (6.35×10(-6) to 2.49×10(-4)Tgyr(-1)). The methane emission from the degassing of flowback waters during drilling of the Utica shale over a 10- to 20-year horizon is estimated from 2.55×10(-3) to 1.62×10(-2)Tgyr(-1). These emissions are from one third to sixty-six times the methane emissions from groundwater discharge to rivers. This study shows that different methane emission sources need to be considered in environmental assessments of methane exploitation projects to better understand their impacts.

PMID: 27267724 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


Links

PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27267724?dopt=Abstract