Reset filters

Search publications


Search by keyword
List by department / centre / faculty

No publications found.

 

Multi-label classification for biomedical literature: an overview of the BioCreative VII LitCovid Track for COVID-19 literature topic annotations

Authors: Chen QAllot ALeaman RIslamaj RDu JFang LWang KXu SZhang YBagherzadeh PBergler SBhatnagar ABhavsar NChang YCLin SJTang WZhang HTavchioski IPollak STian SZhang JOtmakhova YYepes AJDong HWu HDufour RLabrak YChatterjee NTandon KLaleye FAARakotoson LChersoni EGu JFriedrich APujari SCChizhikova MSivadasan NVg SLu Z


Affiliations

1 National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, MD, Bethesda 20892, USA.
2 School of Biomedical Informatics, UT Health, TX, Houston 77030, USA.
3 Raymond G. Perelman Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
4 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
5 College of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, QC, China.
6 CLaC Labs, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
7 Navrachana University, Vadodara, India.
8 Graduate Institute of Data Science, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
9 College of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.
10 Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
11 Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
12 Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
13 School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, AU-VIC, Australia.
14 School of Computing Technologies, RMIT University, Melbourne, AU-VIC, Australia.
15 Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
16 Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
17 LS2N, Nantes University, Nantes, France.
18 LIA, Avignon University, Avignon, France.
19 Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
20 Opscidia, Paris, France.
21 Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
22 Bosch Center for Artificial Intelligence, Renningen, Germany.
23 Institute of Computer Science, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
24 SINAI Group, Department of Computer Science, Advanced Studies Center in ICT (CEATIC), Universidad de Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
25 TCS Research, Life Sciences, Hyderabad, India.

Description

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been severely impacting global society since December 2019. The related findings such as vaccine and drug development have been reported in biomedical literature-at a rate of about 10 000 articles on COVID-19 per month. Such rapid growth significantly challenges manual curation and interpretation. For instance, LitCovid is a literature database of COVID-19-related articles in PubMed, which has accumulated more than 200 000 articles with millions of accesses each month by users worldwide. One primary curation task is to assign up to eight topics (e.g. Diagnosis and Treatment) to the articles in LitCovid. The annotated topics have been widely used for navigating the COVID literature, rapidly locating articles of interest and other downstream studies. However, annotating the topics has been the bottleneck of manual curation. Despite the continuing advances in biomedical text-mining methods, few have been dedicated to topic annotations in COVID-19 literature. To close the gap, we organized the BioCreative LitCovid track to call for a community effort to tackle automated topic annotation for COVID-19 literature. The BioCreative LitCovid dataset-consisting of over 30 000 articles with manually reviewed topics-was created for training and testing. It is one of the largest multi-label classification datasets in biomedical scientific literature. Nineteen teams worldwide participated and made 80 submissions in total. Most teams used hybrid systems based on transformers. The highest performing submissions achieved 0.8875, 0.9181 and 0.9394 for macro-F1-score, micro-F1-score and instance-based F1-score, respectively. Notably, these scores are substantially higher (e.g. 12%, higher for macro F1-score) than the corresponding scores of the state-of-art multi-label classification method. The level of participation and results demonstrate a successful track and help close the gap between dataset curation and method development. The dataset is publicly available via https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/lu/LitCovid/biocreative/ for benchmarking and further development. Database URL https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/lu/LitCovid/biocreative/.


Links

PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36043400/

DOI: 10.1093/database/baac069